Wing Actuator Roll Control with Hydraulic Failure Backup

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Larger aircraft wing designs with improved aerodynamic performance increase payload capacity and flight range but complicate manual control for pilots, as they require more effort to manage flight control surfaces effectively.

Innovation Solution

The system employs wing actuators coupled with ailerons, an alternate power unit, and a flight control computer to automatically control aircraft roll operations, using a differential linkage to convert control wheel position inputs into aileron movements, and includes a mode selector valve and valve spring to adjust fluid flow, ensuring reliable control even in case of hydraulic system failures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If larger aircraft wing designs are used to improve aerodynamic performance, then payload capacity and flight range are improved, but manual control difficulty increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepayload capacityVSAvoidmanual control
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service operation by implementing automatic aileron control through the flight control computer. The FCC receives control wheel position signals and automatically actuates the ailerons without requiring manual pilot intervention, allowing the aircraft to control itself during roll operations while maintaining improved aerodynamic performance from larger wing designs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the traditional mechanical manual control system with an automated flight control computer system. The mechanical linkage between control wheels and ailerons is supplemented by an electronic control system that uses sensors, flight control computers, and electric actuators to substitute for direct mechanical pilot control, reducing manual control difficulty while maintaining aerodynamic efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of operation

If automatic control systems are implemented to reduce pilot workload, then ease of operation is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepilot workloadVSAvoidcontrol system
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The flight control computer performs multiple functions including receiving control wheel position signals, processing control commands, actuating ailerons, and providing backup control capabilities. This multi-functionality consolidates what would otherwise require separate systems into a single integrated unit, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining automatic control benefits and reducing pilot workload

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Power

If hydraulic systems are used to power wing actuators, then power availability is improved, but reliability decreases when hydraulic systems fail

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower availabilityVSAvoidsystem reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements local quality by providing redundant power sources specifically for critical flight control functions. The electric actuators are positioned at the aileron control points to provide localized backup power, ensuring that even if the main hydraulic system fails, the essential roll control function remains reliable and operational

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS12030617B2Systems, methods, and apparatus to control aircraft roll operations using wing actuators
Publication Date: 2024.07.09 THE BOEING CO
  • US12030617B2 patent drawing
  • US12030617B2 patent drawing
  • US12030617B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, methods, and apparatus for controlling aircraft roll operations are disclosed. An example system includes an aileron actuator including a mode selector valve to control fluid flow through the aileron actuator, and a valve spring coupled to the mode selector valve, the valve spring to adjust the mode selector valve from the active position to a block position, the block position to prevent fluid flow through the aileron actuator, a wing cable system coupled to the aileron actuator, a wing actuator coupled to the wing cable system, the wing actuator to control displacement of the aileron of the aircraft in response to the mode selector valve being in the block position, and a differential linkage coupled to the wing actuator and the aileron, the differential linkage to translate the displacement of the wing actuator into rotational movement to adjust the aileron from a first position to a second position.