Wing Assemblies Flap Actuator Positioning Torque Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In large commercial aircraft, the internal placement of flap actuators relative to the fuselage results in uneven spacing and undesirable torques during flap actuation, affecting the efficiency and reliability of high-lift devices like flaps.

Innovation Solution

The inboard-most flap actuator is positioned outboard of the inboard edge of the flap, decoupled from the inboard-most flap support, allowing for even spacing and reduced torque application, with optional configurations using rotary actuators and tracks for enhanced support and control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If the flap actuator is positioned internal to the fuselage, then the flap support structure is simplified, but the actuator spacing becomes uneven and undesirable torques occur during actuation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflap support structureVSAvoidactuator spacing uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The flap actuator is extracted from the traditional internal fuselage location and repositioned to an external location on the wing structure. This extraction resolves the contradiction by enabling even actuator spacing along the flap length while maintaining structural simplicity through the use of the existing wing framework for actuator mounting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The actuator positioning moves from a constrained internal three-dimensional space to a distributed external arrangement along the wing span. This dimensional transition allows actuators to be spaced evenly along the flap length while utilizing the wing's structural framework for support.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Volume of moving object

If the flap actuator is positioned internal to the fuselage, then mounting space is utilized efficiently, but torque application during actuation becomes undesirable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemounting space utilizationVSAvoidtorque application
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The actuator is extracted from the internal fuselage volume and repositioned externally on the wing. This extraction eliminates the torque application problem by allowing the actuator to apply force more directly to the flap support, while mounting space efficiency is maintained through the use of the wing's external structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The wing structure serves as an intermediary element that provides both mounting support for the actuator and a favorable lever arm for torque application. This intermediary approach resolves the contradiction by using the wing framework to transmit actuator forces efficiently to the flap.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Manufacturing precision

If the inboard-most flap actuator is spaced away from the inboard-most flap support, then actuator spacing is optimized, but the structural connection requires additional complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactuator spacing precisionVSAvoidstructural connection
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The structural connection is segmented into distinct components: the actuator mounting bracket, the wing structure, and the flap support. This segmentation allows for precise actuator spacing while distributing the structural complexity across separate, manageable components that can be independently manufactured and assembled.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A mounting bracket or adapter serves as an intermediary component between the actuator and the wing structure. This intermediary element enables precise actuator positioning and spacing while simplifying the overall structural connection by providing a standardized interface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS12043386B2Wing assemblies and aircraft
Publication Date: 2024.07.23 THE BOEING CO
  • US12043386B2 patent drawing
  • US12043386B2 patent drawing
  • US12043386B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Wing assemblies (100) comprise one or more wing support structures (24), an inboard-most flap (32), one or more flap supports (28) that operatively couple the inboard-most flap (32) to the one or more wing support structures (24), and one or more flap actuators (31) configured to operatively move the inboard-most flap (32) relative to the one or more flap supports (28). The flap support(s) (28) comprise at least an inboard-most inboard-flap support (106), the flap actuator(s) (31) comprise at least an inboard-most inboard-flap actuator (108) that is outboard of the inboard edge (102) of the inboard-most flap (32), and the inboard-most inboard-flap actuator (108) is spaced-away from the inboard-most inboard-flap support (106).