Aircraft Wing Harness Layout for Rotor Burst Fault Isolation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing design of electric multirotor aircraft does not adequately consider the arrangement of components to prevent damage from scattered engine fragments in case of a rotor burst, leading to potential failures and reduced safety.

Innovation Solution

The aircraft is designed with a generator and electric motors arranged such that the engine overlaps the wing in the front-rear direction, and the power harnesses are separated within the wing to minimize the risk of simultaneous failure of rotors and power transmission systems in the event of a rotor burst.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Volume of moving object

If the engine is arranged to overlap the wing in the front-rear direction, then the space utilization is improved, but the risk of rotor failure due to fragment scattering increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespace utilizationVSAvoidrotor failure risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The wing is divided into multiple sections with separate harnesses routed through different segments (front wing section and rear wing section). This segmentation ensures that if the engine bursts and scatters fragments, the damage is localized to one segment while other segments remain functional, preventing simultaneous failure of all rotors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The wing structure acts as an intermediary barrier between the engine and the rotors. By routing harnesses through the wing's internal structure at different locations, the wing provides physical separation and protection, reducing the direct impact of engine fragments on critical electrical components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Strength

If the harnesses are routed inside the wing, then the wiring protection is improved, but the complexity of harness arrangement increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewiring protectionVSAvoidharness arrangement complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple harnesses are merged into a single bundled arrangement within the wing structure. Instead of routing each harness separately through complex paths, they are combined into a unified harness assembly that follows a standardized route through the wing, simplifying the overall arrangement while maintaining protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The harnesses are nested within the wing's internal structure, utilizing the existing structural cavities and channels. This nesting approach provides natural protection while avoiding the need for additional external routing, reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

3Reliability

If the engine is positioned to overlap the rotation trajectory region, then the fragment scattering impact is reduced, but the available space for component arrangement decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefragment impact resistanceVSAvoidcomponent arrangement space
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The engine positioning strategy moves from a two-dimensional planar arrangement to a three-dimensional spatial arrangement. By utilizing the vertical dimension and positioning the engine to overlap the rotation trajectory region in the front-rear direction, the design achieves better fragment protection while maintaining adequate space through vertical separation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design reduces the likelihood of rotor failures and power system disruptions during a rotor burst, allowing for continued flight and minimizing damage to components, thereby enhancing safety and reliability.

Implementation Method 1

a generator (46) configured to generate electric power; an engine (44) configured to drive the generator

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

a first electric motor (20V5_1) configured to drive the first rotor; a second electric motor (20V7_2) configured to drive the second rotor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic force: Lorentz Force

Implementation Method 3

a first rotor (18V5) configured to generate thrust in a vertical direction; a second rotor (18V7) configured to generate thrust in the vertical direction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAerodynamic lift: Aerofoil

Implementation Method 4

a wing (14b) attached to a fuselage (12) and configured to generate lift

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAerodynamic lift: Aerofoil

Data Source

PatentUS20230391449A1aircraft
Publication Date: 2023.12.07 HONDA MOTOR CO LTD
  • US20230391449A1 patent drawing
  • US20230391449A1 patent drawing
  • US20230391449A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An aircraft includes: a gas turbine for driving a generator; a first electric motor for driving a first rotor; and a second electric motor for driving a second rotor. The gas turbine is arranged in a manner so that the gas turbine overlaps a rear wing in the front-rear direction of a fuselage, and a first high-voltage harness for transmitting electric power to the first electric motor and a second high-voltage harness for transmitting electric power to the second electric motor are arranged inside the rear wing so as to be separated from each other in the front-rear direction of the fuselage.