Aircraft Wing Trailing Edge Angles for Jet Noise Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing aircraft designs with high bypass ratio jet engines face significant installation noise due to the interaction between the jet engine's turbulent flow and the wing, which current noise reduction methods, such as flaps with saw tooth trailing edges or vortex generators, only marginally address.

Innovation Solution

The design incorporates an aircraft wing with specific trailing edge and rear longitudinal edge angles that intercept the jet engine's flow, optimizing the angle ranges between 5° and 65° or 115° and 175° to reduce installation noise, and ensures a ratio of jet engine axis to wing distance less than 2, with a gas flow velocity between 0.3 and 0.9 Mach, and a Strouhal number below 1.5.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If the jet engine diameter is increased to reduce noise, then the fuel consumption decreases, but the installation noise increases due to closer proximity to the wing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel consumptionVSAvoidinstallation noise
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by modifying specific portions of the wing trailing edge (first portion with specific angle ranges) rather than the entire wing structure. This localized modification allows the wing to interact favorably with the jet flow in the critical interaction zone while maintaining the overall wing design and the benefits of large-diameter high bypass ratio engines.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the geometric parameter of the trailing edge angle to specific ranges (5°-65° or 115°-175°) to optimize the interaction between jet flow and wing. This parameter modification reduces the strength of jet-wing interaction noise while preserving the engine configuration that provides low fuel consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Use of energy by moving object

If the distance between the jet engine and wing is reduced to accommodate large diameter engines, then the fuel efficiency improves, but the interaction noise between jet and wing increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel efficiencyVSAvoidinteraction noise
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention applies local quality by modifying specific portions of the wing trailing edge (first portion with specific angle ranges) rather than the entire wing structure. This localized modification allows the wing to interact favorably with the jet flow in the critical interaction zone while maintaining the overall wing design and the benefits of large-diameter high bypass ratio engines.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the geometric parameter of the trailing edge angle to specific ranges (5°-65° or 115°-175°) to optimize the interaction between jet flow and wing. This parameter modification reduces the strength of jet-wing interaction noise while preserving the engine configuration that provides low fuel consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Object-generated harmful factors

If conventional noise reduction devices (saw tooth trailing edges, vortex generators) are added to the wing, then some noise reduction is achieved, but the device complexity increases and the noise reduction effect is marginal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstallation noiseVSAvoidwing structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the geometric parameter of the trailing edge angle to specific ranges (5°-65° or 115°-175°) to optimize the interaction between jet flow and wing. This parameter modification reduces the strength of jet-wing interaction noise while preserving the engine configuration that provides low fuel consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of adding complex devices to modify the jet flow or trailing edge, the invention inverts the approach by carefully designing the trailing edge geometry itself with specific angle ranges. This inverted approach uses the natural wing structure as the noise control element rather than adding separate modification devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration significantly reduces installation noise by up to 8 dB, with a broader azimuthal noise reduction range, and effectively manages the interaction between the jet engine and wing, improving sound power levels and directivity.

Implementation Method 1

the turbulent flow of the jet from the engine and the solid surface presented by the wing

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTurbulent flow: Turbulence

Implementation Method 2

at least one jet engine with high bypass ratio attached to said wing, suitable for emitting a jet intercepted by a first portion of the trailing edge of said wing

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectJet: Jet

Data Source

PatentUS11292575B2System for reducing the installation noise of an aeroplane wing
Publication Date: 2022.04.05 CENT NAT DE LA RECH SCI (C N R S)
  • US11292575B2 patent drawing
  • US11292575B2 patent drawing
  • US11292575B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In the field of aeronautics, there is disclosed an aircraft with reduced installation noise and specifically an aircraft wing and jet engine system including an aircraft wing and at least one jet engine with high bypass ratio attached to the wing, suitable for emitting a jet intercepted by a first portion of the trailing edge of the wing. The range formed by the set of angles with orientation α defined by a vector following the direction of the jet and by a vector following the tangent at a point of the first portion of the trailing edge and oriented towards the wing tip of the wing, is included within a range of angles selected from the range delimited by 5° and 65°, and the range delimited by 115° and 175°.