Wingtip Airfoils for Aircraft Stall Prevention and Drag Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Aircraft designs face challenges in achieving high speed and low speed efficiency simultaneously, with high-speed aircraft requiring complex designs and high power, leading to increased fuel consumption and costs, while low-speed handling is often compromised for drag reduction, and there is a need for improved safety and reduced wake vortex effects.

Innovation Solution

The use of separate and supported airfoils positioned vertically at the wingtips, acting as enlarged aileron or elevon control surfaces, which produce a downward force opposite to wing lift, allowing for combined control of rotational axes and reducing drag and weight, enabling stall prevention and improved control authority.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If aircraft are designed for high speed operation with drag reduction, then fuel efficiency improves, but low speed handling deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel consumptionVSAvoidlow speed handling
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The invention divides the wing into multiple segments: primary wings providing lift and separate wingtip airfoils providing control. This segmentation allows the main wings to be optimized for drag reduction while the wingtip airfoils handle low-speed control functions, resolving the contradiction between fuel efficiency and low-speed handling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The control function is moved from the traditional two-dimensional wing surface to a three-dimensional configuration with vertically spaced wingtip airfoils. This dimensional transition allows independent optimization of wing aerodynamics for drag reduction while maintaining control authority through the spatially separated airfoils.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Loss of energy

If wingspan is increased to reduce induced drag, then fuel efficiency improves, but structural weight and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinduced dragVSAvoidaircraft weight
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts the drag-reduction function from the wingspan itself and relocates it to compact wingtip airfoils. This allows induced drag reduction to be achieved without increasing overall wingspan, thereby avoiding the associated increases in structural weight and complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the parameter of drag reduction from wingspan dimension to airfoil configuration and positioning. By modifying the vertical spacing and aerodynamic characteristics of the wingtip airfoils, induced drag is reduced without the need for increased wingspan, maintaining structural efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If complex control surfaces are added to improve low speed handling, then handling improves, but drag increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovehandlingVSAvoidsurface drag
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The invention segments the control function into dedicated wingtip airfoils that operate independently from the main wing control surfaces. This allows small, efficient airfoils to provide adequate control authority at low speeds without requiring large, drag-generating control surfaces on the main wings.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The wingtip airfoils serve as simplified copies of the main wing airfoils, providing essential control functions with reduced complexity and drag. These smaller airfoils replicate the aerodynamic principles of the main wings while being optimized for control rather than lift generation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration results in significant reductions in drag and weight, enhancing fuel efficiency, reducing the risk of stalls, and enabling aircraft to operate safely at various speeds, with improved control and stability, while also simplifying design and manufacturing processes.

Implementation Method 1

These airfoils produce downward aerodynamic force, opposite to the direction of wing lift, in normal flight

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAerodynamic lift: Aerofoil

Implementation Method 2

When the airfoils are positioned behind a center of wing lift that is behind the center of mass, the typical horizontal control surfaces can be eliminated

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMoment of inertia: Moment of Inertia

Data Source

PatentUS8657226B1Efficient control and stall prevention in advanced configuration aircraft
Publication Date: 2014.02.25 DBT AERO INC
  • US8657226B1 patent drawing
  • US8657226B1 patent drawing
  • US8657226B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Multiple initiatives are applied to achieve synergistic control enhancement and drag reduction benefits in an aircraft having independent airfoils producing downward force opposite to wing lift in normal flight, which are supported in specific wingtip locations. A method is disclosed teaching the exemplary stall resistance and control at high angles of attack demonstrated by preferred embodiments of the invention.