Vehicle Wiper Device Actuator Mounting and Rotation Restriction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing vehicle wiper devices for rear door glasses with hatch windows face issues due to the large and heavy actuator, which increases the operating force required to open and close the glass, potentially leading to impact and breakage, and complicates the power supply structure when mounted on the glass, while also causing the wiper arm to hang down and interfere with the vehicle's appearance.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle wiper device design where the actuator is mounted on the vehicle body with a reciprocating output shaft and a pivot shaft supported by a glass mounting unit, featuring a coupling mechanism with restrictors and elastic members to prevent the wiper arm from hanging down by restricting its rotation within specific angle ranges, ensuring safe operation and aesthetic integrity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the actuator is mounted on the rear door glass, then the wiper device can be directly mounted on the glass, but the operating force required to open the glass increases and the glass may break due to impact and load

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of opening rear door glassVSAvoidstrength of rear door glass
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The actuator is extracted from the rear door glass and mounted on the vehicle body instead. This separates the heavy component from the glass, eliminating the additional operating force and impact load on the glass while maintaining the wiper functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

A coupling mechanism with coupling pins and coupling holes serves as an intermediary between the actuator and the pivot shaft. This allows the actuator to be mounted on the vehicle body while still transmitting driving force to the wiper mechanism when the glass is closed, without requiring direct mounting on the glass.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If the actuator is mounted on the rear door glass, then the wiper device can be directly mounted on the glass, but the power supply structure becomes complicated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of mounting wiper deviceVSAvoidcomplexity of power supply structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The actuator is extracted from the rear door glass and relocated to the vehicle body. This eliminates the need for complex power supply wiring through the glass and simplifies the overall electrical structure by placing the motor in a location with easier access to the vehicle's existing power supply system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Reliability

If restrictors are provided to prevent the wiper arm from hanging down, then the wiper arm is restricted beyond the rotation angle range, but the lever may collide with the restrictors due to allowance and component variations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of preventing wiper arm hanging downVSAvoidcollision between lever and restrictors
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

Elastic members are provided as a cushioning mechanism between the lever and the restrictors. When the lever approaches the restrictors due to component variations or allowance, the elastic members deform to absorb the impact, preventing direct collision and potential damage while still maintaining the rotation restriction function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

4Power

If the actuator is large and heavy, then the wiper device can perform the wiping function, but the operating force required to open the rear door glass increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewiping powerVSAvoidoperating force to open glass
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The heavy actuator is extracted from the rear door glass assembly and mounted on the vehicle body. This separation removes the additional weight and operating force requirement from the glass opening operation, while the actuator continues to provide sufficient power for the wiper function through the coupling mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively prevents the wiper arm from hanging down, reduces the risk of glass breakage, simplifies the power supply, and maintains the vehicle's appearance by controlling the wiper arm's rotation within defined angles, even with varying forces and component sizes.

Implementation Method 1

A first elastic member arranged at least on one of the restrictor and the second coupling portion. When the hatch window is open, the first elastic member contacts the second coupling portion between the restrictor and the second coupling portion.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

A second elastic member arranged at least on one of the restrictor and the second coupling portion. When the hatch window is open, the second elastic member contacts the second coupling portion between the restrictor and the second coupling portion.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS7979949B2Vehicle wiper device
Publication Date: 2011.07.19 DENSO CORP
  • US7979949B2 patent drawing
  • US7979949B2 patent drawing
  • US7979949B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An actuator for rotating an oscillating disk is mounted on a rear door. A pivot shaft provided with a lever is rotatably supported on a rear door glass. The lever is provided with a first elastic portion and second elastic portions. When the rear door glass is open, the first elastic member contacts the lever between the first restrictor and the lever. As a result, the rotation of the lever toward the outside of a first angle range by a first rotational force or less is restricted. The second elastic portion contacts the lever between the first restrictor and the lever even if the lever rotates toward the outside of a second angle range by a rotational force greater than the first rotational force.