Wiper Arm Assembly Locking Tab Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing wiper arm assemblies face increased manufacturing and assembly costs due to permanent fixation methods and are prone to inadvertent disassembly during transport or handling due to sliding bearing surfaces.

Innovation Solution

A wiper arm assembly design featuring a locking mechanism with a locking tab and recess on the mounting head and wiper arm, where the locking surfaces engage under spring tension to prevent disassembly, allowing for secure attachment and easy assembly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If permanent fixation methods (staked pin or rivet) are used to attach mounting head and wiper arm, then reliability of connection is improved, but manufacturing cost and assembly complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconnection reliabilityVSAvoidassembly complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The locking mechanism is segmented into distinct components: a locking tab on one part and a corresponding recess on the other part. This segmentation allows for simpler assembly compared to permanent fixation, as the parts can be locked together through a simple engagement process rather than requiring staking or riveting operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The locking tab acts as an intermediary element that mediates the connection between the mounting head and wiper arm. Instead of directly permanently joining the two main components, the locking tab serves as a intermediate locking element that simplifies the assembly process while maintaining connection reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If bearing surfaces are allowed to slide relative to one another for easy assembly, then ease of assembly is improved, but inadvertent disassembly during transport or handling occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of assemblyVSAvoidresistance to inadvertent disassembly
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The locking tab and recess are designed to engage in advance during the assembly process, creating a preliminary locking action that prevents the bearing surfaces from sliding apart during subsequent handling or transport. The spring mechanism applies preliminary force to ensure the locking surfaces remain engaged.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The spring is pre-loaded to apply continuous force that maintains the locking surfaces in engagement. This preliminary action ensures that the mounting head and wiper arm remain securely connected throughout assembly, transport, and handling operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If spring tension is increased to prevent disassembly, then reliability is improved, but the force required for assembly increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresistance to disassemblyVSAvoidassembly force
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The locking mechanism incorporates dynamic elements including a spring that can compress and expand, and a locking tab that can rotate or move during assembly. This dynamic design allows the system to accommodate the forces applied during assembly while maintaining reliable locking once assembled.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The spring constant and pre-load force are optimized to provide sufficient locking force during normal operation while requiring only moderate assembly force. The geometric parameters of the locking tab and recess are designed to facilitate easy engagement while maintaining strong locking capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design reduces manufacturing costs, prevents inadvertent disassembly, and ensures a long and reliable operational life by securely locking the mounting head and wiper arm in the shipping position.

Implementation Method 1

a spring operably attached to the mounting head and the wiper arm... the force imparted by the coil spring maintains the wiper blade in wiping engagement with the window

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring tension: Spring

Implementation Method 2

The locking surfaces prevent the mounting head and the wiper arm from rotating back toward the disassembled position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS7971313B2Wiper arm assembly having a locking tab
Publication Date: 2011.07.05 PGI NORTHSTAR LLC
  • US7971313B2 patent drawing
  • US7971313B2 patent drawing
  • US7971313B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A wiper arm assembly and method of construction thereof includes a mounting head and a wiper arm configured for relative rotation during assembly from a disassembled position to a shipping position, wherein the wiper arm and mounting head are locked against rotation toward the disassembled position once in the shipping position. The mounting head and wiper arm have locking surfaces configured for locked engagement with one another while in the shipping position. The locking surfaces are brought into engagement with one another by a force imparted by a spring while rotating the mounting head relative to the wiper arm from the disassembled position toward the shipping position. When in the shipping position, the locking surfaces confront each other and prevent the mounting head and the wiper arm from rotating back toward the disassembled position from the shipping position.