Wire Basket Winding Fixture for Closed-Bottom Forming

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The manual and costly process of manufacturing wire baskets with complex grid structures and open bottoms requires significant skill and time, especially for varying sizes and shapes, and often necessitates additional crimping to secure the root ball during transportation.

Innovation Solution

A device featuring a rotating spinning fixture with angled arms and a wire feed system that winds wire onto the fixture in a preselected pattern, allowing for the creation of a continuous, closed-bottom wire basket from a single strand of wire with minimal manual intervention, using a traverse apparatus to translate the wire feed and rotate the spinning fixture simultaneously.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If wire baskets are manufactured by joining several individual strands of wire to form a grid structure, then the basket structure can be formed, but the manufacturing process becomes costly and complex requiring considerable skill and time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of manufactureVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The basket manufacturing process is segmented into distinct operational phases: wire feeding, forming loops, winding in spiral pattern, and closing the bottom. Each phase is automated by specific device components working in sequence, transforming a complex manual joining process into manageable automated segments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Manual mechanical operations of wire bending, looping, and joining are replaced by an automated mechanical system comprising a rotating fixture, wire feeder, and forming mechanism. The system uses controlled mechanical motion to automatically create the basket structure without manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Extent of automation

If a complicated machine process is used to form loops and wind wire in spiral around the basket side, then the basket can be machine-made, but additional operations are required to close the bottom and the process remains complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation levelVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The loop-forming operation and the spiral-winding operation are merged into a single continuous automated process. The rotating fixture simultaneously performs both functions as wire is fed through the system, eliminating the need for separate manual operations to close the bottom.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The wire feeding and basket forming operations continue uninterrupted in a single continuous motion. The rotating fixture maintains constant motion while wire is fed at controlled rates, creating loops and winding the basket body and bottom in one seamless automated sequence without stopping for additional operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Ease of manufacture

If baskets are made with open bottom using continuous wire winding, then manufacturing is simplified, but additional crimping operations are required to secure the root ball during transportation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidroot ball security
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The bottom-closing action is performed preliminarily during the main winding process rather than as a subsequent operation. The rotating fixture automatically forms the bottom structure as part of the continuous wire winding, creating a closed-bottom basket that inherently secures the root ball without requiring additional crimping operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Adaptability or versatility

If manual operations are used to form and join wire strands, then flexibility in producing various sizes and shapes is maintained, but production time and skill requirements increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesize and shape varietyVSAvoidproduction efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The device incorporates adjustable and reconfigurable components that allow dynamic adaptation to different basket specifications. The rotating fixture and wire feeding mechanism can be adjusted to produce various sizes and patterns by changing operational parameters rather than requiring different manual techniques, maintaining versatility while dramatically improving productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11154923B2Method and device for making wire baskets
Publication Date: 2021.10.26 NYP LLC
  • US11154923B2 patent drawing
  • US11154923B2 patent drawing
  • US11154923B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A device and method for making a wire basket, the device having a spinning fixture with a top plate with an outer periphery, arms attached at a top end at the periphery of the top plate and projecting downwardly, such that bottom ends of the arms collectively form a circular arrangement having a diameter greater than the diameter of the top plate, a means for guiding wire onto the spinning fixture such that the wire is wound onto the spinning fixture in a preselected pattern, and contacts to maintain the wire onto the spinning fixture in preselected locations, and the method including providing an apparatus for delivery of wire through a wire feed and for translating the wire feed lineally along a traverse, providing a spinning fixture for winding wire thereon, and winding a preselected pattern of wire onto the spinning fixture by translating the wire feed along the transverse.