Wire EDM Validation Cut-Outs for Fir-Tree Slot Machining

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current wire electric discharge machining (wEDM) methods are costly and labor-intensive, particularly in aerospace applications, where even small improvements can lead to significant material, cost, and time savings.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for wire electric discharge machining (wEDM) that involves cutting and detaching slugs to define validation cut-outs, executing multiple passes to achieve surface finishes, and using a controller with stored wEDM parameters to machine fir-tree shaped slots in turbine discs, with validation processes including cleaning, chemical, and metallurgical analyses to ensure quality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If traditional wEDM methods are used to machine parts, then machining can be performed, but the process is costly and labor-intensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoidlabor intensity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by creating a validation cut-out (a test cavity) before machining the actual feature. This validation cut-out allows the process to verify material properties and predict machining outcomes in advance, reducing the need for expensive trial-and-error machining and minimizing labor-intensive adjustments during production

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses the validation cut-out as a copy or representative sample of the intended feature to predict machining behavior. By analyzing the validation cut-out's characteristics (surface finish, dimensional accuracy), the process can determine whether to proceed with full machining, thereby avoiding costly and labor-intensive machining of parts that would fail anyway

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Reliability

If validation processes are implemented to ensure quality, then part quality improves, but the process complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepart qualityVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The validation cut-out serves as a preliminary quality check that simplifies the overall process by catching potential failures early. Rather than implementing complex continuous monitoring systems, the patent uses a single preliminary validation step that provides sufficient quality assurance while maintaining process simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts the validation function into a separate, standalone cut-out that is removed after serving its purpose. This separation allows quality validation to be performed independently without complicating the main machining process, as the validation cut-out can be analyzed separately to determine proceed/no-proceed decisions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Manufacturing precision

If multiple wEDM passes are executed to achieve surface finish, then surface quality improves, but machining time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface finish qualityVSAvoidmachining time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The validation cut-out serves as a preliminary test to determine whether multiple finishing passes are necessary. By analyzing the surface finish of the validation cut-out after initial passes, the process can decide whether additional time-consuming finishing passes are needed for the actual feature, thereby minimizing unnecessary machining time while ensuring required surface quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by executing multiple finishing passes only on the validation cut-out initially, rather than on the entire feature. This allows surface quality to be verified with minimal time investment, and full finishing passes are applied to the actual feature only if the validation confirms the parameters are correct

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances the efficiency and quality of wEDM processes, reducing costs and labor while ensuring high-quality surface finishes and material integrity, making it suitable for aerospace applications.

Implementation Method 1

wire electric discharge machining (wEDM) cutting and detaching a slug from a portion of the part

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectWire electric discharge machining: Electrical Discharge Machining

Implementation Method 2

using wEDM, cutting and detaching the portion having the validation cut-out from the part

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectWire electric discharge machining: Electrical Discharge Machining

Data Source

PatentUS11554433B2Methods and systems for wire electric discharge machining and validation of parts
Publication Date: 2023.01.17 PRATT & WHITNEY CANADA CORP
  • US11554433B2 patent drawing
  • US11554433B2 patent drawing
  • US11554433B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of wire electric discharge machining (wEDM) a feature in a part includes using wEDM, cutting and detaching a slug from a portion of the part that is to be detached from the part to define the feature, and thereby defining a validation cut-out in the portion, and using wEDM, cutting and detaching the portion having the validation cut-out from the part and thereby defining the feature.