Wire-Fed 3D Metal Printing With Joule-Heated Droplet Deposition

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing additive manufacturing techniques for metallic parts face challenges such as high costs, safety risks, and inefficiencies due to the use of metal powders, which require excessive heat and result in waste and slow processing times.

Innovation Solution

The method involves using metal wire as feedstock, heated by electric current at the point of contact to form molten droplets that adhere and build 3D structures layer by layer, eliminating the need for sintering steps and minimizing heat input, thereby reducing waste and processing time.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If metal powder is used as feedstock in conventional additive manufacturing, then the process can build 3D structures layer by layer, but the process becomes slow and expensive due to the need to spread powder across the entire build area for each layer

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefabrication speedVSAvoidtime for spreading powder
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The invention segments the build area into discrete deposition locations and deposits metal particles only at these specific locations rather than spreading powder across the entire build area. This selective deposition approach eliminates the time-consuming powder spreading step while maintaining the ability to build 3D structures layer by layer

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention uses a support structure pre-formed from non-conductive material that defines the build area and provides a foundation for selective metal particle deposition. This preliminary structure enables direct particle placement without requiring powder spreading equipment and processes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Strength

If laser sintering is used to fuse metal particles, then the particles can be joined to form 3D structures, but excessive heat is required and safety risks increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebonding of metal particlesVSAvoidexcessive heat and safety risks
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention replaces the thermal field (laser heating) with an electrical field (electrostatic charging). Instead of using laser energy to heat and fuse metal particles, the system uses electrostatic forces to attract charged metal particles to the charged support structure, eliminating the need for excessive heat and associated safety risks

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the fundamental parameter used for particle bonding from thermal energy (temperature) to electrical energy (electrostatic charge). This parameter change allows metal particles to be joined without the excessive heat required by laser sintering, thereby reducing safety risks while maintaining bonding capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Strength

If adhesive bonding followed by sintering is used, then metal particles can be joined, but the process complexity and time required increase due to multiple processing steps

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvejoining of metal powdersVSAvoidnumber of processing steps
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention merges the bonding function into a single electrostatic deposition step, eliminating the need for separate adhesive bonding and sintering steps. The electrostatic field simultaneously attracts metal particles to the support structure and facilitates their joining, reducing process complexity while achieving strong metal-to-metal bonds

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Productivity

If conventional powder-based additive manufacturing is used, then 3D structures can be built, but material waste increases because the entire build area must be filled with powder

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to build 3D structuresVSAvoidmetal powder waste
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The invention segments the metal material delivery to match the segmented build geometry, depositing particles only at the specific locations where structure material is needed. This selective deposition eliminates the waste inherent in filling the entire build area with powder, while still enabling complete 3D structure construction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the material state from bulk powder (requiring complete area coverage) to individually controllable charged particles. This allows precise placement of metal particles only where needed in the 3D structure, dramatically reducing material waste while maintaining structural integrity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces waste, lowers costs, enhances safety, and allows for faster fabrication of metallic parts with various metals and alloys, using established welding and CAM technologies with inert gas shielding and precise control over the wire electrode.

Implementation Method 1

heated by electric current at the point of contact to form molten droplets

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectJoule heating: Joule Heating

Implementation Method 2

molten droplets that adhere and build 3D structures layer by layer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCooling: Cooling

Data Source

PatentUS12090565B2Systems for printing three-dimensional objects
Publication Date: 2024.09.17 RELATIVITY SPACE INC
  • US12090565B2 patent drawing
  • US12090565B2 patent drawing
  • US12090565B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure provides a system for printing at least a portion of a three-dimensional (3D) object. The system may comprise a source of at least one feedstock, a support for supporting at least a portion of the 3D object, a feeder for directing at least one feedstock from the source towards the support, and a power supply for supplying electrical current. The system may comprise a controller operatively coupled to the power supply. The controller may receive a computational representation of the 3D object. The controller may direct the at least one feedstock through a feeder towards the support and may direct electrical current through the at least one feedstock and into the support. The controller may subject such feedstock to Joule heating such that at least a portion of such feedstock may deposit adjacent to the support, thereby printing the 3D object in accordance with the computational representation.