Wire Harness Line Balancing With Task Dependency Verification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Manual line balancing of workstations for manufacturing wire harness variants is complex, time-consuming, and error-prone, especially when manufacturers introduce design changes or add new variants, often leading to manufacturing bottlenecks.

Innovation Solution

A computing system implementing a line balancing tool that generates a structured bill of materials, decomposes tasks, assigns them to workstations, and verifies dependencies to optimize the manufacturing process for wire harness production.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If manual line balancing is performed for wire harness variants, then flexibility to handle design changes is maintained, but the process becomes complex, time-consuming, and error-prone

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility to handle design changesVSAvoidcomplexity of line balancing process
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical process of line balancing with an automated computer-based system. The system uses software to automatically generate structured bills of materials, decompose tasks, assign them to workstations, and verify dependencies, eliminating the need for manual intervention while handling design changes and new variants efficiently

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by automatically generating structured bills of materials and decomposing tasks before line balancing is needed. When design changes or new variants are introduced, the system has already prepared the task structures and dependencies, enabling rapid re-balancing without starting from scratch

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If manual line balancing is performed for multiple wire harness variants, then all variants can be accommodated, but the time required increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to manufacture multiple variantsVSAvoidtime required for line balancing
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces time-consuming manual line balancing operations with automated computer-based processing. The system rapidly generates structured bills of materials, decomposes tasks, and assigns them to workstations for multiple variants simultaneously, reducing the time required from weeks to minutes or hours

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides universal functionality by handling multiple wire harness variants through a single automated platform. It can process different SBOMs, task structures, and workstation configurations for various variants without requiring separate manual balancing processes for each one

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Adaptability or versatility

If manual line balancing is performed iteratively for design changes, then updated variants are produced, but manufacturing bottlenecks occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to incorporate design changesVSAvoidmanufacturing throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces iterative manual line balancing with automated computer-based processing that can rapidly incorporate design changes. The system automatically updates structured bills of materials, re-decomposes tasks, and re-assigns them to workstations, maintaining manufacturing throughput while adapting to design changes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary generation of structured bills of materials and task decompositions, so when design changes occur, the foundation is already prepared. This allows rapid iterative updates without the delays associated with manual re-balancing, preventing manufacturing bottlenecks

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Ease of manufacture

If manual line balancing is performed, then task assignments can be made, but errors increase due to complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to assign tasks to workstationsVSAvoidaccuracy of line balancing
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces error-prone manual line balancing with automated computer-based processing. The system systematically generates structured bills of materials, decomposes tasks according to defined rules, assigns them to workstations based on constraints and dependencies, and verifies assignments, eliminating human errors while maintaining the ability to make task assignments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentEP3928170B1Harness assembly line balancing
Publication Date: 2025.11.12 SIEMENS INDUSTRY SOFTWARE INC
  • EP3928170B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3928170B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3928170B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

This application discloses a computing system implementing a line balancing tool to generate a structured bill of materials for a wire harness based on a harness design and available fabrication processes. The computing system can decompose the structured bill of materials into tasks and assign the tasks to workstations in a production line configured to manufacture the wire harness. The computing system can determine dependencies between a plurality of the tasks and verify the tasks assigned to the workstation conform to the dependencies between the plurality of the tasks. The dependencies can indicate an order for performance of the operations associated with the tasks. The computing system can identify unassigned tasks capable of assignment to one or more of the workstations and determine which of the workstations the unassigned assembly tasks, if assigned, would conform with the dependencies between the plurality of the assembly tasks.