Automated Software Prototyping from Wireframes

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The conventional software development process is complex and time-consuming, often resulting in project delays and increased costs due to the separation of user interface design and source code development.

Innovation Solution

An online software development system that automates feature identification and instant prototyping by receiving wireframes, comparing them to existing software screens, detecting matches, and integrating corresponding features to generate a navigable prototype.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional software development process is used with separate UI design and source code development stages, then design quality can be maintained, but development time and cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:

Improvedesign qualityVSAvoiddevelopment time

Core Design Contradiction:

Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges UI design and source code development into a unified process by using a visual programming interface where drag-and-drop UI element placement automatically generates corresponding source code. This eliminates the separation between design and implementation stages, allowing simultaneous progression of both tasks without manual translation or handoff between teams.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by automatically generating source code templates, data structures, and validation logic during the UI design phase itself. Rather than waiting until coding begins, the system pre-generates the skeletal framework and boilerplate code based on visual design decisions, reducing subsequent development time.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If conventional software development process is used with multiple stages, then thorough testing can be performed, but project completion time extends to months or years

Engineering Contradiction:

Improvetesting thoroughnessVSAvoidproject duration

Core Design Contradiction:

ReliabilityVSDuration of action of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables continuous testing throughout the development process by allowing users to test applications in real-time as UI elements are being designed and configured. Rather than waiting for complete development, the system maintains continuous feedback loops where testing can occur at any stage, eliminating idle waiting time between development phases.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The system allows skipping of traditional lengthy testing phases by providing immediate visual feedback and automated validation during the design process itself. Basic functionality and UI correctness can be verified instantly through the visual interface, allowing the team to rush through preliminary testing that would traditionally require separate dedicated testing phases.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #21Skipping (Rushing through)

3Adaptability or versatility

If manual UI design and code implementation are performed separately, then design flexibility can be maintained, but development efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:

Improvedesign flexibilityVSAvoiddevelopment efficiency

Core Design Contradiction:

Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces dynamics by making the development process adaptive and responsive rather than static and linear. The visual programming interface allows real-time modifications to UI design that automatically update the generated source code, enabling flexible iteration without the rigid constraints of traditional waterfalls. Changes can be made dynamically at any point and the system adapts by regenerating relevant code portions.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #15Dynamics

4Loss of information

If traditional software development with three-party interaction (designers, developers, customers) is used, then comprehensive requirements can be gathered, but consistency and efficiency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:

Improverequirements completenessVSAvoidprocess complexity

Core Design Contradiction:

Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables self-service by allowing customers or stakeholders to directly interact with and modify the visual design interface themselves, eliminating the need for constant intermediary translation between technical and non-technical parties. Users can directly configure UI elements, adjust parameters, and see immediate results, serving their own needs without requiring designer or developer mediation for every change.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS12314688B2Integrated application development systems and methods

Publication Date: 2025.05.27 ENGINEER AI CORP

AI summary

A system for developing software provides automatically identifies, based on wireframe images, features from a library of features for a custom software application, implements simulations of a plurality of the features available for demonstration through the graphical user interface, stores blocks of source code for each feature in a source code repository wherein the blocks are adapted to provide an actual application when compiled by developers, receives from the client device, by a server running a software building component, one or more selected features for the software application, automatically integrates, by the software building component, the one or more selected features to generate an integrated feature set based on attributes of each of the selected features and an inter-feature rules set, and generates an interactive visualization of a navigable prototype of the software application based on the integrated feature set.