2x4 Wiregrid Polarizer Array for Microgrid Imaging

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current 2×2 wiregrid polarizer arrays in imaging polarimeters suffer from aliasing issues, limiting image resolution and quality, despite their long-term use in remote sensing applications.

Innovation Solution

A new 2×4 array pattern of wiregrid polarizers with specific polarization orientations (45 degrees, 0 degrees, 315 degrees, 90 degrees, and 0 degrees) is introduced, which minimizes aliasing and increases spatial bandwidth for improved image resolution and quality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If a 2×2 wiregrid polarizer array is used, then device complexity is reduced and ease of manufacture is improved, but image resolution and quality deteriorate due to aliasing issues

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of manufactureVSAvoidimage resolution
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The polarizer array is segmented into more individual wiregrid polarizers (2×4 instead of 2×2), with each polarizer having a specific polarization orientation. This segmentation increases the spatial bandwidth and reduces aliasing, thereby improving image resolution while maintaining manufacturability through the modular array structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the array have different polarization orientations (45°, 0°, 315°, 90°, 0°) tailored to specific positions. This local variation in polarization properties optimizes the spectral separation for each Stokes parameter, improving overall image quality and resolution without compromising ease of manufacture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Device complexity

If a 2×2 wiregrid polarizer array is used, then device complexity is reduced, but aliasing increases limiting image bandwidth

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice complexityVSAvoidaliasing
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

By dividing the array into more individual polarizers (2×4 configuration), the spatial sampling density increases, which reduces aliasing effects. The segmentation allows for better spectral separation of Stokes parameters while keeping the overall device structure relatively simple and manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention transitions from a 2×2 to a 2×4 array configuration, effectively adding more elements in one dimension. This dimensional expansion increases the spatial bandwidth and separates the spectral components more effectively, reducing aliasing without significantly increasing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Manufacturing precision

If a 2×4 array pattern is used, then image resolution and quality improve by increasing spatial bandwidth, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage resolutionVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The 2×4 array segments the polarizer elements into specific orientations that maximize spatial bandwidth utilization. This segmentation improves image resolution by reducing aliasing, while the systematic arrangement keeps the device complexity manageable through regular patterning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the array configuration parameter from 2×2 to 2×4 and adjusts polarization orientations to specific values (45°, 0°, 315°, 90°, 0°). These parameter changes increase spatial bandwidth and improve image resolution, while the changes are systematic and can be manufactured with existing technologies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The 2×4 array pattern significantly reduces aliasing risks and enhances image quality by increasing the separation of polarimetric image components, maintaining noise performance optimality and fidelity to original Stokes images.

Implementation Method 1

A wiregrid polarizer can be made as a layer of very thin ruled aluminum wires sandwiched between two glass windows. The most common microgrid arrangement is a 2×2 repeating pattern of so-called analyzer cells. The polarization orientations of the wiregrid polarizers in each 2×4 array may, beginning from an arbitrary top left wiregrid polarizer of each array and continuing clockwise, be: 45 degrees; zero degrees; 315 degrees; 90 degrees; zero degrees; 45 degrees; 90 degrees; and, 315 degrees.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPolarization: Polarisation

Data Source

PatentUS9857226B2Microgrid arrangement for integrated imaging polarimeters
Publication Date: 2018.01.02 THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES AS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE
  • US9857226B2 patent drawing
  • US9857226B2 patent drawing
  • US9857226B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An integrated microgrid imaging polarimeter comprises a repeating pattern of wiregrid polarizers in a new 2×4 array that improves image resolution and quality by increasing the spatial bandwidth available for each Stokes image despite that the new repeating pattern is larger than prior art 2×2 arrays. An example embodiment has polarization orientations of the wiregrid polarizers in each 2×4 array, beginning from an arbitrary top left polarizer of each array and continuing clockwise, as: 45 degrees; zero degrees; 315 degrees; 90 degrees; zero degrees; 45 degrees; 90 degrees; and, 315 degrees. The disclosure includes an analysis showing development of the new 2×4 array and supporting its improved performance over prior art 2×2 arrays.