WireGuard-GRE Traffic Tunneling for Distributed Malware Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing cybersecurity methods, such as sandboxes and VPNs, are ineffective against advanced malware that can bypass IP address detection and target specific corporate subnets, requiring resource-intensive client-server architectures and lacking central management of IP addresses in distributed networks.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a two-layer tunneling system using WireGuard and GRE levels, with a central server managing IP addresses, allowing encapsulation and decapsulation of packets to maintain anonymity and detect malicious content across a distributed network.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If simple NAT technique is used to replace sandbox IP address with corporate subnet IP address, then IP address anonymity is improved, but the solution becomes ineffective because corporate subnet ignores incoming packets that were not originally sent by it

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveeffectiveness of IP address replacementVSAvoidsimplicity of NAT implementation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a VPN server as an intermediary component between the sandbox and the corporate network. The VPN server performs NAT operations and acts as a mediator that forwards packets bidirectionally, ensuring that responses from external servers are properly routed back to the sandbox. This resolves the contradiction by maintaining simplicity while ensuring effectiveness through the intermediary's packet forwarding capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If VPN with client-server architecture is used to perform natting and denatting operations, then IP address replacement effectiveness is improved, but resource consumption increases due to maintaining large number of connections

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveeffectiveness of IP address replacementVSAvoidresource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a distributed network where each node (emitter and gateway) performs NAT and denatting operations autonomously based on local configuration tables. This eliminates the need for a centralized VPN server to maintain all connections, allowing each node to serve itself and reducing overall resource consumption while maintaining effective IP address replacement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If distributed network without central management of IP addresses is used, then resource efficiency is improved, but coordination and routing between nodes becomes complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource efficiencyVSAvoidcomplexity of IP address coordination
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements pre-computed routing tables that are distributed to all nodes before operation. These tables contain all necessary IP address mappings and routing information, allowing nodes to perform NAT and routing operations autonomously without real-time coordination. This preliminary action resolves the contradiction by enabling resource-efficient distributed operation while avoiding runtime coordination complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20250330448A1Method and a system of tunneling traffic in a distributed network for detecting malware
Publication Date: 2025.10.23 GRP IB GLOBAL PTE LTD
  • US20250330448A1 patent drawing
  • US20250330448A1 patent drawing
  • US20250330448A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and system for tunneling traffic in a distributed network are provided. The method comprises: adding, by a central server, at least one emitter and at least one gateway to a neighbor table hosted on the at least one central server; transmitting an IP address of a given emitter to a respective gateway; transmitting an IP address of the respective gateway to the given emitter; in response to receiving a given packet of outgoing traffic from the given emitter, decapsulating the given packet; identifying at the WireGuard level of the given packet, the IP address of the respective gateway associated with the given emitter; encapsulating the given packet at the WireGuard level and the GRE level; and forwarding the given packet of outgoing traffic to the respective gateway for natting for transmitting the given packet to an external server on behalf of the respective gateway.