Wireless Actuator Control Protocol for Automotive Networks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current automotive network architectures face issues with reliability, long communication delays, limited modularity, and scalability due to hierarchical wired communication systems, which can lead to system failures and inefficiencies when controlling actuators.

Innovation Solution

Implementing novel wireless protocols that allow decentralized wireless distributed peripheral modules (wDPMs) to communicate directly with actuators, eliminating the need for centralized ECUs and using a wireless communication system for actuator control, with protocols that prioritize actuator operations and manage time slots efficiently across channels.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If hierarchical wired communication systems are used with centralized ECUs, then system reliability is maintained through structured architecture, but device complexity and cable harness complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem reliabilityVSAvoidcable harness complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical wired cable harness system with a wireless communication system. wDPMs communicate with actuators wirelessly, eliminating the need for physical cables connecting each actuator to centralized ECUs. This substitution maintains system reliability through structured architecture while dramatically reducing cable harness complexity and weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts the communication function from the centralized ECU architecture and distributes it to wireless nodes. By taking out the requirement for physical cable connections and implementing wireless communication, the system eliminates cable harness complexity while maintaining structured communication through protocol-based architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Ease of operation

If centralized ECU architecture is used, then control authority is maintained, but communication delays increase and modularity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol authorityVSAvoidcommunication delays
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the centralized ECU control architecture into distributed wireless nodes. Each wDPM operates as an independent control unit with its own actuator, eliminating the need for signals to traverse through multiple centralized ECUs. This segmentation reduces communication delays while maintaining control authority at the local level.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of having centralized ECUs control actuators through hierarchical signal routing, the patent inverts the architecture by enabling direct wireless control from distributed nodes. The control flow goes from the wireless network directly to the actuator, eliminating intermediate routing steps and reducing communication delays.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

3Reliability

If wired field bus systems are used, then communication reliability is maintained through physical connections, but system weight and costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication reliabilityVSAvoidcar weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical wired field bus system with wireless communication technology. wDPMs use wireless transceivers to communicate with actuators, eliminating the need for physical cable harnesses throughout the vehicle. This substitution significantly reduces system weight while maintaining communication reliability through protocol-based error checking and retransmission mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentEP2571188B1Protocol for wireless networks
Publication Date: 2019.07.10 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • EP2571188B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2571188B1 patent drawingFigure 2a
  • EP2571188B1 patent drawingFigure 2b

AI summary

A wireless transmission method includes providing a commanding node and a plurality of sub-networks. Each of the sub-networks includes at least one responding node. Time slots are assigned to the sub-networks such that time slots assigned to each sub-network are interleaved in time with time slots assigned to at least one other sub-network. Within each time slot, at least one acknowledgement packet is transmitted from the at least one responding node before a command packet is sent from the commanding node within the time slot. Each at least one acknowledgement packet indicates whether or not a most recent command packet from the commanding node was correctly received by the responding node, whereby a command packet comprises a selection bit and a direction bit providing operational information to a responding node.