Wireless AI Data Collection With Event-Triggered Reporting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing wireless communication systems face inefficiencies in data collection for artificial intelligence (AI) applications, particularly in minimizing overhead and latency, and lack optimized mechanisms for triggering events based on data novelty, network configuration changes, and model performance metrics.

Innovation Solution

Implementations provide enhanced data collection processes in wireless communications systems, utilizing AI models to trigger events based on data sample novelty, network configuration changes, and model performance metrics, enabling efficient data collection and reporting through UEs and network equipment (NEs), with support for multiple logging configurations and improved signaling accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If traditional data collection methods are used in wireless communication systems, then data can be collected for AI applications, but signaling overhead and latency increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata collection volumeVSAvoidsignaling overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and separates trigger event conditions from general data collection processes. By identifying specific triggering conditions (data novelty thresholds, configuration changes, model performance metrics), the system only initiates data collection when necessary, rather than continuously collecting data. This extraction of trigger conditions reduces unnecessary signaling overhead while maintaining adequate data collection for AI applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of data collection from continuous to event-triggered based on multiple conditions including data novelty measures, configuration parameter changes, and model performance metrics. This parameter change allows the system to adapt data collection frequency dynamically, reducing signaling overhead when conditions are stable while ensuring data collection when changes occur that affect AI model performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Quantity of substance

If continuous data collection is performed for AI applications, then sufficient training data is available, but latency increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining data availabilityVSAvoiddata collection latency
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary action by pre-defining trigger events and conditions before data collection begins. The system pre-establishes thresholds for data novelty, configuration changes, and model performance metrics that will trigger data collection. This preliminary configuration allows the system to respond immediately when conditions are met, reducing latency compared to continuous monitoring without predefined triggers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements periodic action through event-triggered data collection based on specific conditions occurring at irregular intervals. Rather than continuous collection, the system periodically checks for trigger events (data novelty thresholds, configuration changes, model performance degradation) and collects data only when these events occur. This periodic, event-driven approach reduces overall latency while ensuring data collection when it is most needed for AI model updates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Measurement precision

If data collection is triggered by multiple conditions (novelty, configuration changes, performance metrics), then data collection accuracy improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata collection accuracyVSAvoidtrigger event monitoring complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the trigger event monitoring into distinct, independent conditions: data novelty measures, configuration parameter changes, and model performance metrics. Each condition is monitored and evaluated separately with its own thresholds and evaluation criteria. This segmentation allows the system to maintain high measurement precision through multiple independent checks while managing complexity by treating each condition as a separate, manageable module rather than a monolithic complex system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20260019837A1Data collection for artificial intelligence in wireless communications
Publication Date: 2026.01.15 LENOVO (SINGAPORE) PTE LTD
  • US20260019837A1 patent drawing
  • US20260019837A1 patent drawing
  • US20260019837A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Various aspects of the present disclosure relate to data collection for artificial intelligence in wireless communications. An apparatus, such as a UE, receives control information comprising a first field indicating a trigger event for a data collection process, where the trigger event is based at least in part on one or more of a data sample novelty measure, a change in a configuration parameter of a node, a change in a condition of a node, a model performance metric, or model monitoring output. The apparatus triggers, based at least in part on an occurrence of the trigger event, a data collection process to generate a reporting set from a set of measured samples, and processes the reporting set based at least in part on the control information including to one or more of report the reporting set to a different node or log the reporting set to generate a logged reporting set.