Wireless Device Antenna Segmentation for Metal Surface Mounting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing wireless communication devices struggle to maintain effective communication when attached to metal surfaces, as they often experience impaired communication characteristics and reduced radiation efficiency due to impedance mismatching and stray capacitance issues.

Innovation Solution

A wireless communication device design featuring an RFIC element with first and second terminal electrodes, a first radiation electrode connected to the first terminal electrode, a second radiation electrode in the same layer but independent of the first, and a back surface electrode positioned opposite to the second radiation electrode, with the area opposite to the first radiation electrode being smaller, allowing for improved radiation efficiency and long-distance communication.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a conventional wireless communication device is attached to a metal surface, then it can perform wireless communication, but communication characteristics deteriorate and radiation efficiency decreases due to impedance mismatching and stray capacitance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication characteristicsVSAvoidradiation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The radiation electrode is divided into multiple segments with different areas positioned opposite to different terminal electrodes of the RFIC. This segmentation allows each segment to be optimized independently, with larger area segments compensating for stray capacitance effects and smaller area segments maintaining proper impedance matching, thereby resolving the contradiction between maintaining communication characteristics and improving radiation efficiency when attached to metal surfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different portions of the back surface electrode are given different areas (local quality variation) depending on their position relative to the RFIC terminal electrodes. The electrode area is locally adjusted to compensate for position-dependent stray capacitance effects, enabling the device to maintain both good communication characteristics and high radiation efficiency when attached to metal surfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If the back surface electrode area is increased to compensate for stray capacitance, then communication characteristics improve, but impedance matching deteriorates and radiation efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication characteristicsVSAvoidimpedance mismatching
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The back surface electrode is segmented into multiple regions with different areas, each positioned opposite to specific terminal electrodes. This segmentation allows the electrode to provide sufficient total area to compensate for stray capacitance while maintaining local area proportions that preserve proper impedance matching, thereby resolving the contradiction between improving communication characteristics and avoiding impedance mismatching.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Device complexity

If a single radiation electrode is used, then device complexity is reduced, but radiation efficiency decreases when attached to metal surfaces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrode structureVSAvoidradiation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The radiation electrode is segmented into multiple segments with different areas positioned opposite to different terminal electrodes of the RFIC. This segmentation enables the device to achieve high radiation efficiency when attached to metal surfaces by optimizing each segment's area to compensate for stray capacitance effects, while still maintaining a relatively simple overall structure that is easy to manufacture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The device achieves wireless communication with higher radiation efficiency and maintains communication characteristics even when attached to metal surfaces, utilizing the metal surface as an antenna for long-distance communication without significant changes in performance.

Implementation Method 1

a first radiation electrode connected to the first terminal electrode of the RFIC element; a second radiation electrode disposed in the same layer or plane as the first radiation electrode independently of the first radiation electrode and connected to the second terminal electrode of the RFIC element

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic radiation: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

utilizing the metal surface as an antenna for long-distance communication without significant changes in performance

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic reflection: Reflection

Data Source

PatentUS10726322B2Wireless communication device and article equipped with the same
Publication Date: 2020.07.28 MURATA MFG CO LTD
  • US10726322B2 patent drawing
  • US10726322B2 patent drawing
  • US10726322B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A wireless communication device is provided that has an RFIC element including first and second terminal electrodes, a first radiation electrode connected to the first terminal electrode of the RFIC element, a second radiation electrode disposed in the same layer as the first radiation electrode independently of the first radiation electrode and connected to the second terminal electrode of the RFIC element, and a back surface electrode disposed oppositely to the second radiation electrode at a distant and connected to the second radiation electrode. Moreover, an area of a portion of the back surface electrode opposite to the first radiation electrode is smaller than an area of a portion of the back surface electrode opposite to the second radiation electrode.