Wireless Backhaul FEC Control for Delay-Sensitive Data

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In wireless communication systems, using a wireless backhaul line leads to poor communication quality and increased communication delay due to higher packet error rates, which are exacerbated by error correction methods like FEC, making it difficult to maintain both quality and delay requirements.

Innovation Solution

A wireless communication apparatus that determines whether to add redundant data based on allowable delay time, using a processor to classify packets and adjust transmission accordingly, prioritizing radio resources and transmission schemes to optimize communication quality and delay in heterogeneous networks with mixed wireless standards and cell radii.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If error correction methods like FEC are applied to improve communication quality over wireless backhaul lines, then communication reliability is improved, but communication delay increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication qualityVSAvoidcommunication delay
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent dynamically changes the FEC coding rate parameter based on channel conditions and traffic requirements. By adjusting the coding rate (e.g., from 1/2 to 3/4), the system can achieve better error protection when needed while minimizing overhead and delay when channel conditions are good, thus resolving the contradiction between reliability and delay

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements dynamic adaptation of error correction strategies based on real-time channel quality indicators and traffic characteristics. The FEC application is not static but dynamically adjusted, allowing the system to switch between aggressive error correction (for poor channels) and minimal correction (for good channels), balancing reliability and delay requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If redundant data is added to all packets to ensure communication quality, then reliability is improved, but transmission efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication qualityVSAvoidtransmission efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of applying uniform error correction to all packets, the patent applies error correction selectively based on local characteristics of each packet or traffic flow. Critical packets (e.g., control signals, real-time data) receive stronger FEC protection, while less critical packets use minimal or no redundancy, thus improving reliability where needed without sacrificing overall transmission efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial error correction only to the extent necessary for each traffic type rather than excessive correction to all data. This partial action approach ensures sufficient reliability for critical communications while avoiding the performance penalty of applying full error correction universally, thereby maintaining transmission efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Loss of time

If priority control schemes are used to reduce delay, then communication delay is reduced, but communication quality deteriorates due to higher packet error rates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication delayVSAvoidcommunication quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent dynamically adjusts the FEC coding rate parameter based on channel conditions and traffic requirements. By adjusting the coding rate (e.g., from 1/2 to 3/4), the system can achieve better error protection when needed while minimizing overhead and delay when channel conditions are good, thus resolving the contradiction between reliability and delay

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements dynamic adaptation of error correction strategies based on real-time channel quality indicators and traffic characteristics. The FEC application is not static but dynamically adjusted, allowing the system to switch between aggressive error correction (for poor channels) and minimal correction (for good channels), balancing reliability and delay requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS10716028B2Wireless communication apparatus and wireless communication method
Publication Date: 2020.07.14 PANASONIC INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT CO LTD
  • US10716028B2 patent drawing
  • US10716028B2 patent drawing
  • US10716028B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided is a wireless communication apparatus capable of improving communication quality and reducing a communication time delay in a case of communicating data over a backhaul line. The wireless communication apparatus is a wireless communication apparatus which communicates with another wireless communication apparatus over a wireless backhaul line in which a plurality of wireless communication schemes are mixed and used, and includes a processor that determines whether or not to add redundant data to data, in accordance with an allowable delay time of the data, and an antenna that transmits the data by adding or not adding the redundant data to the data, in accordance with a result of the determination.