Wireless Backoff Mechanism for Lower Priority Access Categories

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In wireless communication systems, lower priority access categories frequently experience unfairness and service limitations due to frequent backoff processes when higher priority access categories obtain channel access, leading to inefficient resource sharing and reduced throughput.

Innovation Solution

A method and device for detecting the TXOP sharing state in lower priority access categories, allowing for differentiated backoff procedures based on the detected sharing state, ensuring fairness by adjusting contention windows and optimizing resource utilization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If higher priority AC obtains channel access when internal collision occurs, then priority service quality is improved, but lower priority AC experiences frequent backoff triggering which affects fairness and limits service

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepriority service qualityVSAvoidfairness of lower priority AC
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by differentiating the backoff behavior of lower priority AC based on the specific collision scenario. When a lower priority AC collides with a higher priority AC, the system detects the TXOP sharing state and applies different backoff strategies: if TXOP sharing is supported, the lower priority AC does not trigger backoff; if not supported, backoff is triggered. This localized differentiation resolves the contradiction by maintaining priority service quality while ensuring fairness for lower priority AC under specific conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamics by making the backoff triggering behavior adaptive rather than static. The lower priority AC's backoff decision is dynamically adjusted based on the detected TXOP sharing state of the higher priority AC. This dynamic adjustment allows the system to optimize between priority service quality and lower priority fairness in real-time based on channel conditions and AC capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If lower priority AC triggers backoff process frequently, then higher priority AC service quality is maintained, but resource utilization efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehigher priority AC service qualityVSAvoidresource utilization efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by selectively triggering backoff only when necessary. Instead of always triggering backoff for lower priority AC during internal collisions, the system detects the TXOP sharing state and triggers backoff only when TXOP sharing is not supported. This localized application of backoff maintains higher priority service quality while avoiding unnecessary resource idle time and improving overall resource utilization efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts the potentially harmful effect of frequent backoff triggering into a benefit by using the collision detection mechanism to inform smarter resource allocation decisions. The backoff triggering becomes a useful signal that helps coordinate between different ACs, ensuring priority service while improving overall system efficiency by avoiding redundant backoff events when TXOP sharing is available.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Ease of operation

If differentiated backoff procedure is implemented based on TXOP sharing state, then fairness for lower priority AC is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefairness for lower priority ACVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies universality by designing a detection mechanism that serves multiple functions: it identifies collision scenarios, determines TXOP sharing capability, and informs backoff decisions all through a single unified process. This multi-functional approach improves fairness for lower priority AC while minimizing the increase in system complexity by consolidating multiple functions into one detection mechanism rather than adding separate complex control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements self-service by enabling each AC to autonomously detect the TXOP sharing state and make its own backoff decision based on this detection. The lower priority AC independently determines whether to trigger backoff based on the detected state, without requiring complex centralized control. This self-service approach improves fairness while keeping system complexity manageable through distributed autonomous decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS9578658B2Backoff method and device used for wireless communication system
Publication Date: 2017.02.21 HUAWEI TECH CO LTD
  • US9578658B2 patent drawing
  • US9578658B2 patent drawing
  • US9578658B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus, method, and system to provide a backoff method and device used for a lower priority access category AC. The method includes: when the lower priority AC and another AC in a same station STA obtain a transmission opportunity TXOP at the same time and an internal collision occurs, detecting a TXOP sharing state of the lower priority AC; and executing backoff of the lower priority AC according to the detected TXOP sharing state.