Wireless Beam Group Selection for Millimeter Wave Systems

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current wireless communication systems face challenges in determining optimal beams efficiently due to the complexity and time required for beam selection, especially in millimeter wave communications, where multiple transmit and receive beams need to be optimized, and frequent changes occur as mobile devices move.

Innovation Solution

The method involves using beam groups and composite beams to reduce complexity and time in determining optimal beams by transmitting and receiving reference signals using grouped beams, allowing for faster selection and handover processes in wireless communication systems.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If beam scanning is performed to select optimal transmit and receive beams, then beamforming efficiency is improved, but the time and complexity required for beam determination increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebeamforming efficiencyVSAvoidbeam determination complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the beam selection process into two distinct phases: beam group determination followed by individual beam selection. First, multiple beams are grouped together and evaluated as groups using reference signals, reducing the initial search space. Then, only the selected beam group undergoes detailed individual beam evaluation. This segmentation reduces the overall complexity from evaluating all individual beams to evaluating beam groups first, then individual beams within the selected group.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges multiple individual beams into beam groups for joint evaluation. Instead of evaluating each beam separately, multiple beams are combined into groups and assessed together using reference signals transmitted in group units. This merging reduces the number of evaluation steps required and decreases the control overhead associated with individual beam determination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple transmit and receive beam directions are supported, then communication coverage and flexibility are improved, but the time required for optimal beam determination increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebeam direction flexibilityVSAvoidbeam determination time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the large set of beam directions into multiple beam groups, where each group contains multiple individual beams. The beam group determination phase evaluates groups rather than individual beams, reducing the time required to narrow down the search space. This segmentation allows the system to support many beam directions while reducing determination time by processing beams in organized groups rather than individually.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary beam group determination before final individual beam selection. By first identifying promising beam groups through reference signal evaluation at the group level, the system prepares in advance for the more detailed individual beam selection phase. This preliminary action reduces the overall determination time by eliminating unpromising beams early in the process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If frequent beam re-determination is performed to maintain optimal beams during mobile movement, then communication reliability is improved, but control overhead increases considerably

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication reliabilityVSAvoidcontrol overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple beam evaluations into beam group evaluations, reducing the number of separate control messages required. When beams are evaluated in groups, the control overhead for beam determination is reduced because fewer individual beam reports and acknowledgments are needed. This merging approach maintains communication reliability during mobile movement while significantly reducing the control overhead associated with frequent re-determination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs partial beam determination by first evaluating beam groups and then selectively evaluating only the individual beams within selected groups. This partial action approach determines only the necessary beam information required for maintaining reliable communication, rather than performing complete individual beam evaluations for all beams. This reduces control overhead while maintaining the reliability needed for mobile communication scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS10057025B2Apparatus and method for determining beam in wireless communication system
Publication Date: 2018.08.21 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD
  • US10057025B2 patent drawing
  • US10057025B2 patent drawing
  • US10057025B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method to operate a receiving node is provided. The method includes receiving a first set of reference signals being transmit-beamformed using transmit beam groups in at least one transmitting node with receive-beamforming using receive beam groups. The method also includes transmitting information to select one transmit beam group of the transmit beam groups to one of the at least one transmitting node. The method further includes receiving a second set of the reference signals being transmit-beamformed using transmit beams of the one of the transmit beam groups in the at least one transmitting node with receive-beamforming using receive beams of one of the receive beam groups.