Wireless Bridge Beacon Interval Adaptation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Wireless bridges continuously transmit signals, causing interference to surrounding electronics and potential health concerns due to electromagnetic radiation, and lack adaptability in transmission modes to suit different environments.

Innovation Solution

A wireless network communication device with multiple signal transmission modes (normal, extended, and no-transmission) and statuses (normal, delay, idle) that adjusts based on detected signals from terminal instruments, using modules for signal detection and transmission interval management to minimize interference and radiation exposure.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the wireless bridge continuously transmits signals to provide uninterrupted service, then service reliability is improved, but interference to surrounding electronics and electromagnetic radiation increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice reliabilityVSAvoidinterference and electromagnetic radiation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The wireless bridge transmits beacon signals periodically rather than continuously. The system uses a timer to control the transmission interval, allowing the bridge to remain in a low-power state between transmissions. This periodic transmission maintains service reliability by ensuring clients can reconnect when needed, while significantly reducing continuous electromagnetic radiation and interference to surrounding electronics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The wireless bridge monitors for client disconnection events and uses this feedback to adjust transmission behavior. When a client disconnects, the bridge extends its beacon transmission interval to ensure the disconnected client can re-establish connection. This feedback mechanism maintains reliability without requiring continuous transmission, as the system adapts its behavior based on actual network conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Object-generated harmful factors

If the wireless bridge extends the beacon transmission interval to reduce interference, then electromagnetic radiation is reduced, but service reliability may deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectromagnetic radiationVSAvoidservice reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system monitors client connection status and uses feedback to dynamically adjust the beacon transmission interval. When clients are connected, the bridge uses shorter intervals for reliable communication. When clients disconnect, the bridge extends the interval to reduce radiation, while the extended interval still allows time for disconnected clients to reconnect. This feedback-based adaptation maintains reliability without requiring continuous transmission.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The beacon transmission interval is made dynamic rather than fixed. The system adjusts the interval based on real-time network conditions, client connection status, and detected disconnection events. This dynamic adjustment allows the bridge to optimize between radiation reduction and service reliability, transitioning between different transmission patterns as needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If the wireless bridge operates in normal mode with continuous transmission, then service performance is maintained, but adaptability to different environments is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice performanceVSAvoidadaptability to different environments
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The wireless bridge implements multiple operational modes (normal mode, extended mode, idle mode) that can be dynamically selected based on environmental conditions and network demand. This dynamic mode selection allows the system to adapt to different scenarios: using normal mode for high-performance requirements, extended mode for reduced radiation in low-activity periods, and idle mode for minimal operation when no clients are present. This multi-mode design significantly enhances adaptability while maintaining service performance when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS7966009B2Method for determining the status of a wireless network communication device
Publication Date: 2011.06.21 ARCADYAN
  • US7966009B2 patent drawing
  • US7966009B2 patent drawing
  • US7966009B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention discloses a method for determining the working status of a wireless network communication device. The method includes determining the probe request or broadcast packet or any wireless packet with its destination address equal to this AP address, and then determining whether extending the time interval of signal transmission based on the detection result. Next, when the device does not receive the probe requests or broadcast packet or any wireless packet with its destination address equal to this AP address within the first predetermined interval, the wireless network communication device will switch to the idle mode. Further, the step of the present invention includes determining whether awakening or shutdown the wireless network communication device based on the result of the detection of the probe request or broadcast packet or any wireless packet with its destination address equal to this AP address within the second predetermined interval.