Wireless Access Point Control Keys for Safe Cargo Handling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing cargo handling systems face safety concerns due to multiple operators being able to control cargo handling components simultaneously, leading to potential safety risks and accidents.

Innovation Solution

A wireless access point system that limits control to a preselected number of devices by using a controller to manage control keys and timers, ensuring only one device can control the system at a time and automatically adjusting access based on inactivity thresholds.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If multiple operators with multiple PEDs are allowed to control the cargo handling system simultaneously, then operational flexibility and efficiency are improved, but safety risks increase due to potential conflicts and accidents

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiencyVSAvoidsafety
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

A wireless access point (WAP) controller acts as an intermediary between multiple PEDs and the cargo handling system. The WAP receives control requests from multiple operators, manages authentication, and coordinates control access to prevent simultaneous conflicting operations. This mediator approach allows multiple users to interact with the system safely through centralized control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts control permissions based on real-time system state and operational context. Control access is not static but changes according to the number of active devices, system mode, and operational requirements. The WAP can grant or revoke control rights dynamically to optimize both safety and operational flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If control access is restricted to a single device at a time, then safety is improved by preventing conflicting operations, but operational flexibility deteriorates due to reduced multi-operator capability

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidoperational flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from static single-device control to dynamic multi-device control management. The WAP controller evaluates each control request based on current system state, allowing the number of permitted control devices to vary according to operational needs while maintaining safety through centralized coordination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The WAP performs preliminary authentication and authorization checks before granting control access to any PED. Control permissions are pre-established through authentication protocols, and the system proactively manages control rights allocation to prevent unsafe multi-device control scenarios before they occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of operation

If multiple devices are permitted to control the system simultaneously, then ease of operation is improved by allowing multiple operators, but device complexity increases due to the need for control coordination mechanisms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemulti-operator controlVSAvoidcontrol coordination system
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The WAP serves as a complexity-absorbing intermediary that handles all control coordination logic. Individual PEDs remain simple control interfaces without needing complex coordination capabilities. The mediator centralizes the complexity of managing multiple control devices, making the system easier to operate while containing complexity in a dedicated control component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentEP3764176B1Wireless network session management
Publication Date: 2022.09.07 GOODRICH CORP
  • EP3764176B1 patent drawingFigure 1A~1B
  • EP3764176B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3764176B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A method for limiting control of a cargo handling system may comprise receiving, by a controller (104) of a wireless access point (102), a system control request from a PED (160). The controller may determine a number of devices currently controlling the cargo handling system. The controller may send a first control key to the PED if the number of devices controlling the cargo handling system is fewer than a threshold number of devices or the controller may send a request denied message if the number of devices controlling the cargo handling system is greater than or equal to the threshold number of devices.