Wireless Closed Loop Control Scheduling System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing wireless closed loop control systems face challenges in achieving low latency, precise synchronization, and high reliability due to the complexity of scheduling transmissions and synchronizing nodes in wireless networks.

Innovation Solution

A method for scheduling transmissions in wireless closed loop control systems involves defining downlink and uplink timeslots within a maximum cycle time, ensuring non-overlapping timeslots, and synchronizing nodes through a series of synchronization messages to achieve tight synchronization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If wireless transmissions are scheduled without strict time slot separation, then device complexity is reduced, but latency and synchronization precision deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescheduling complexityVSAvoidlatency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The wireless communication channel is segmented into distinct downlink and uplink time slots that do not overlap. This segmentation allows simultaneous full-duplex operations without interference, reducing latency by eliminating the need for complex dynamic scheduling while maintaining precise timing through structured time division.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs periodic time slot allocation where downlink and uplink transmissions occur in regular, predetermined intervals. This periodic structure enables nodes to synchronize their operations naturally, reducing synchronization complexity while maintaining low latency through predictable transmission patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

2Productivity

If downlink and uplink transmissions overlap in time, then communication efficiency improves, but synchronization precision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication efficiencyVSAvoidsynchronization precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system resolves the time overlap conflict by introducing a time dimension separation, where downlink and uplink transmissions occur in different time slots rather than simultaneously. This dimensional separation maintains high communication efficiency through continuous transmission while achieving precise synchronization by eliminating temporal conflicts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Loss of time

If cycle time is reduced to meet ultra-low latency requirements, then latency improves, but reliability deteriorates due to reduced transmission time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecycle timeVSAvoidpacket delivery reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-scheduling downlink and uplink time slots in advance, allowing nodes to prepare their transmissions beforehand. This preliminary organization enables ultra-short cycle times by eliminating on-the-fly scheduling delays while maintaining reliability through pre-coordinated error handling and acknowledgment mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system maintains continuous useful action by ensuring that while downlink and uplink are separated in time, the overall communication cycle operates continuously without idle gaps. Each time slot is fully utilized for productive transmission, maintaining high reliability through continuous error checking and retransmission protocols within the compressed cycle time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS12225583B2Scheduling system and method for scheduling transmissions from a controller node to a downlink node and from an uplink node to the controller node
Publication Date: 2025.02.11 KK TOSHIBA
  • US12225583B2 patent drawing
  • US12225583B2 patent drawing
  • US12225583B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for scheduling transmissions between a controller node, one or more, and one or more uplink nodes comprising: defining one or more non-overlapping downlink and uplink timeslots within a maximum cycle time period; scheduling each of the downlink nodes to listen to receive a respective downlink transmission from a one or multiple radios of the controller node in one of the downlink timeslots on one of a plurality of channels such that none of the downlink transmissions conflict with each other; and scheduling each of the uplink nodes to transmit a respective uplink transmission to a controller radio in one of the uplink timeslots on one of the channels such that none of the uplink transmissions conflict with each other. Each of the downlink nodes is scheduled to listen on a same channel as another if it is possible to do so without any of the respective downlink transmissions conflicting; and each of the uplink nodes is scheduled to transmit on a same channel as another if it is possible to do so without any of the respective uplink transmissions conflicting.