Wireless Controller Base Station Split for Low-Latency IIoT Links

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing wireless communication systems in IIoT environments face challenges in meeting stringent latency and reliability requirements due to multiple communication hops between controllers and sensor/actuators, which increase latency and complicate resource management.

Innovation Solution

Implementing an Integrated Access Backhaul (IAB) framework with a semi-static split of communication resources between backhaul and access links, combined with dynamic gNB control using interrupt resources, to reduce the number of transmission hops and enhance resource allocation flexibility.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If multiple communication hops are used between controllers and sensor/actuators, then system coverage and connectivity are improved, but latency increases and reliability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem coverageVSAvoidlatency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the communication system into multiple functional units distributed across different locations. Each unit performs specific communication functions locally, reducing the need for multiple hops across the entire network. This segmentation allows controllers to communicate directly with sensor/actuators in the same location while maintaining broader system coverage through coordinated operation of segmented units.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces intermediary communication units that act as local relays between controllers and sensor/actuators. These intermediaries establish direct communication paths within local areas, eliminating the need for messages to traverse multiple distant hops through central nodes, thereby reducing latency while maintaining system-wide connectivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple communication hops are used between controllers and sensor/actuators, then system coverage is improved, but reliability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem coverageVSAvoidcommunication reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the communication system into distributed functional units, the patent creates multiple independent communication paths. This segmentation ensures that failures in one segment do not propagate throughout the entire system, maintaining reliability while achieving broad coverage through coordinated operation of segmented units.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where communication units monitor and report on the status of local communication paths. This feedback enables dynamic adjustment of communication routes, allowing the system to bypass failed hops and maintain reliable communication between controllers and sensor/actuators across the distributed network.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Device complexity

If semi-static resource split is implemented, then resource allocation structure is simplified, but flexibility in resource allocation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource allocation structureVSAvoidresource allocation flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines semi-static resource splitting with dynamic adjustment capabilities. The basic resource allocation structure remains semi-static for simplicity, but the system dynamically adjusts resource allocation within each segment based on real-time communication demands, maintaining both structural simplicity and allocation flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

By segmenting resource allocation into independent units, the patent allows each segment to be managed with simple semi-static rules while the collection of segments provides overall flexibility. Each segmented unit can allocate resources independently based on local conditions, achieving system-level adaptability through composed simple local decisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Loss of time

If direct communication between controllers and sensor/actuators is enabled, then latency is reduced, but resource management complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovelatencyVSAvoidresource management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments resource management responsibilities to local communication units that enable direct controller-to-sensor/actuator communication. Each segmented unit manages its own local resources independently, preventing centralized complexity while allowing direct communication paths that reduce latency for local operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP4104603B1Dynamic base station control for wireless controller
Publication Date: 2026.03.04 QUALCOMM INC
  • EP4104603B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4104603B1 patent drawingFigure 2A
  • EP4104603B1 patent drawingFigure 2B

AI summary

Methods, systems, and devices for wireless communication are described. In a system with high reliability and low latency targets, base station control can be dynamically configured. In some systems, a semi-static split with a greater duration for communications between a controller and one or more associated sensor/actuators than a duration for communications between the controller and base station can be used. In some embodiments, an interrupt can be used to allow for base station control.