Configurable Wireless Controller for Distributed Device Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing energy-efficient systems for controlling electronic devices in residential and commercial facilities are costly and complex due to the inflexibility of centralized control systems, making it difficult to manage and monitor power usage effectively.

Innovation Solution

An integrated configurable wireless electronic device controller that communicates via a wireless protocol, monitors operating parameters, and adjusts power based on received instructions and sensor inputs, allowing for flexible control and monitoring of various electronic devices.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If centralized control systems are used to control electronic devices, then control capability is provided, but system complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the centralized control system into distributed wireless controllers, each independently controlling specific electronic devices. This segmentation eliminates the need for a complex centralized system while maintaining control capability across multiple devices through individual wireless units.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The wireless controller is designed with universal functionality to control multiple types of electronic devices (lights, appliances, HVAC) through a single unit. This multi-functionality replaces the need for separate control systems for each device type, reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Ease of operation

If centralized control systems are used to control electronic devices, then control capability is provided, but implementation cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol capabilityVSAvoidimplementation cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs inexpensive wireless controller units that can be deployed individually throughout the facility. These affordable units replace expensive centralized control infrastructure, enabling cost-effective implementation while maintaining comprehensive device control capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces complex mechanical/electrical centralized control wiring with wireless communication technology. This substitution eliminates costly installation of control wiring and hardware while preserving full control capability across electronic devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Adaptability or versatility

If flexible control of electronic devices is desired, then adaptability improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveflexibilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The wireless controller incorporates dynamic adaptability through programmable logic that can be configured for different device types and control scenarios. This dynamic flexibility allows the system to adapt to various electronic devices without increasing physical complexity, as the adaptability is achieved through software configuration rather than hardware complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS10762028B2Wireless electronic device controller
Publication Date: 2020.09.01 HUBBELL INC
  • US10762028B2 patent drawing
  • US10762028B2 patent drawing
  • US10762028B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments include an integrated configurable electronic device controller for controlling at least one load coupled to the controller. The controller includes a communications interface operable to communicate via a wireless communications protocol, a configurable port and a processing system. The processing system is configured to receive, via the communications interface, one or more instructions for controlling power of the at least one load. The processing system is also configured to monitor one or more operating parameters of the at least one load. The processing system is further configured to generate one or more signals to control the power of the at least one load based, at least in part, on the received instructions and the monitoring; and report, via the communications interface, the one or more operating parameters to a management system.