Wireless Device Security System Using Location Monitoring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Retail stores and other entities face challenges in securely managing portable electronic devices without physically tethering them, as existing methods either restrict full functionality or risk damaging the devices, and large magnet detectors can be discomforting to shoppers.

Innovation Solution

A wireless device security system that monitors the location of inventory electronic devices within a designated security area, alerting administrators and users when devices are moved outside the area, and employs adaptive blurring and alert mechanisms to encourage return, while allowing devices to be used freely within the area.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If physical tethers or affixing mechanisms are used to prevent theft, then device security is improved, but device functionality and user experience deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice securityVSAvoiddevice functionality
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical security systems (physical tethers, magnetic tags, ink mechanisms) with an electronic/software-based solution. The security system uses software agents, location tracking via GPS or other positioning systems, and remote communication to monitor and control device location, eliminating the need for physical constraints while maintaining security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary security system that acts as a mediator between the device and the user/environment. This system includes location monitoring components, communication modules, and control mechanisms that indirectly manage device security through information processing and remote intervention rather than direct physical constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If magnetic tags with loud audio alarms are used at store exits, then theft detection is improved, but shopper comfort deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetheft detectionVSAvoidshopper discomfort
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical/acoustic alarm system with an electronic monitoring and notification system. Instead of loud audio alarms triggered by magnetic sensors, the system uses location tracking, wireless communication, and electronic alerts to notify authorities or store personnel of potential theft, eliminating the harmful loud noises while maintaining detection capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If devices are physically affixed to surfaces, then device security is improved, but device mobility and testing capability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice securityVSAvoiddevice mobility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces physical affixing mechanisms with electronic location monitoring and remote control systems. Devices remain physically mobile and can be freely handled by customers, but the electronic system continuously tracks location and can remotely disable or alert if the device is taken outside authorized areas, maintaining security without restricting mobility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS10878135B2Wireless device security system
Publication Date: 2020.12.29 APPLE INC
  • US10878135B2 patent drawing
  • US10878135B2 patent drawing
  • US10878135B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A device in a wireless device security system may include at least one processor configured to determine a location of the device with respect to a security area. The at least one processor may be further configured to provide an alert output when the determined location of the device is proximate to a boundary of the security area. The at least one processor may be further configured to prevent the device from responding to at least some user input when the determined location of the device is outside of the security area. The at least one processor may be further configured to provide a disturbance output when the determined location of the device is outside of the security area.