Wireless Device Operating State Control Based on Physical Speed

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing solutions for preventing the use of wireless devices while driving, such as hands-free sets, may still distract drivers and are not always appropriate, and there are safety, legal, and liability concerns associated with using wireless devices while driving, especially across different jurisdictions.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that determine the operating state of a wireless device based on its physical speed and position, enabling or disabling device features accordingly, and communicating status information to allow or restrict device functionality, ensuring compliance with geographic-specific laws and safety requirements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a hands-free set is installed to allow wireless device use while driving, then the driver's hands are freed for driving, but the driver may still be distracted and it requires installation in a vehicle

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehands-free operationVSAvoiddriver distraction
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The wireless device automatically detects its own operating state (driving vs. non-driving) using its processor and sensors, and autonomously enables or disables features without requiring manual configuration or external hands-free set installation. The device serves itself by monitoring its environment and adjusting its functionality accordingly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the operational parameters of the wireless device based on detected conditions. When driving conditions are detected (via motion sensors, location data, or vehicle integration), the device transitions from a fully operational state to a restricted state where certain features are disabled, thereby adapting its behavior to the hazardous environment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If device features are disabled based on detected driving conditions, then safety is improved by preventing distracted use, but the device becomes less versatile in different operating states

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoiddevice functionality
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The wireless device dynamically adjusts its functionality based on real-time detection of operating conditions. The system continuously monitors for driving conditions and automatically transitions between operational modes: fully functional when not driving, and restricted when driving is detected. This dynamic adaptation ensures safety while maintaining versatility across different contexts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The wireless device maintains multiple functional states to serve different purposes: full functionality for non-driving use, and a restricted but still operational mode for driving use. The device universally handles both scenarios by automatically selecting the appropriate functional level, ensuring it remains versatile across all operating conditions rather than being limited to a single mode.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If the wireless device automatically determines operating state based on speed and position, then legal compliance is improved across different jurisdictions, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelegal complianceVSAvoidoperating state determination
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The wireless device pre-loads and stores geographic-specific information including speed limits and operating state criteria for multiple jurisdictions before needing them. When the device travels to a new location, it retrieves the relevant compliance rules from its stored database based on its current position, rather than requiring complex real-time analysis or external connectivity to determine compliance requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces complex mechanical or manual systems for determining operating state with electronic and software-based solutions. The device uses its processor to automatically analyze position data (from GPS or other location services), compare it against stored geographic-specific information, and determine the appropriate operating state through software logic rather than manual configuration or complex hardware sensors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentEP1916854B1Automatic operation of a wireless device based on the speed of the wireless device
Publication Date: 2010.03.24 BLACKBERRY LTD
  • EP1916854B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP1916854B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP1916854B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

A wireless device operates in an operating state determined as a function of the wireless device's physical physical speed. In some implementations, the wireless device determines the physical speed using a GPS (global positioning system). If the wireless device determines based on the physical position and/or physical speed that the user is driving an automobile in a region in which using a wireless device is not permitted while driving, then the wireless device automatically disables device features. However, if the user is actually a passenger, then the user may over-ride the automatic disabling of device features. In some implementations, the wireless device also informs other wireless users that communication is inappropriate or impossible. In some implementations, the wireless device also informs a communications node to process communications directed to the wireless device.