Base Station Wireless Flow Scheduling with Threshold-Based Priority Queues

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing scheduling schemes in wireless communication systems are not optimized for low-latency applications, leading to delays in processing data flows that are sensitive to delay, particularly in 5G and beyond systems.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a new data flow scheduling algorithm at the base station that includes an intra-user flow scheduler to update priorities based on flow size relative to a threshold and an inter-user flow scheduler to allocate packets to users with similar per-RB metrics, using a multiple level feedback queue (MLFQ) scheduling scheme.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If existing scheduling schemes are used in wireless communication systems, then spectral efficiency and fairness in resource allocation are maintained, but latency in processing delay-sensitive data flows increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovelatencyVSAvoidflow completion time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The scheduling system segments data flows into different queues based on priority levels. The base station maintains multiple queues for different priority levels and selects queues based on flow characteristics, allowing delay-sensitive flows to be processed separately from other traffic types, thereby reducing latency while maintaining overall spectral efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The scheduling algorithm dynamically adjusts priority assignments and queue selections based on real-time flow characteristics and channel conditions. The base station determines priorities of flows and updates scheduling decisions dynamically, enabling the system to respond to changing network conditions and minimize latency for delay-sensitive data flows

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If priorities of data flows are updated based on flow size, then processing efficiency for delay-sensitive flows is improved, but scheduling complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing efficiencyVSAvoidscheduling complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The scheduling system incorporates feedback mechanisms where the base station monitors flow characteristics and updates priorities accordingly. The intra-user flow scheduler receives feedback about flow sizes and characteristics, adjusts priorities dynamically, and notifies the inter-user flow scheduler, creating a closed-loop system that improves processing efficiency while managing complexity through structured feedback protocols

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-configuring priority levels and queue structures before data flow processing begins. The base station pre-establishes multiple priority queues and scheduling parameters, allowing rapid decision-making during actual data transmission without requiring complex real-time calculations, thus improving processing efficiency while limiting scheduling complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20250240811A1Method and device for scheduling in wireless communication system
Publication Date: 2025.07.24 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD
  • US20250240811A1 patent drawing
  • US20250240811A1 patent drawing
  • US20250240811A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method performed by a base station in a wireless communication system may comprise: determining the priority of flows to be transmitted to at least one user; based on a new flow coming in, an intra-user flow scheduler determines whether the flow size is smaller than a specified threshold and updates the priority; and allocating the flow to a queue on the basis of the updated priority.