In-Network Wireless Interference Detection Through Airtime Correlation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing wireless networks struggle to distinguish between foreign and in-network interference, leading to inaccurate channel selection and frequent, unnecessary channel switches due to unaccounted in-network interference.

Innovation Solution

Implementing processors to determine a correlation between total interference and airtime usage of client devices, allowing differentiation between foreign and in-network interference, and selectively switch channels based on the determined interference types.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If processors determine total interference without distinguishing interference types, then channel selection can be made simply, but channel selection accuracy deteriorates due to in-network interference being misclassified as foreign interference

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterference measurement accuracyVSAvoidinterference detection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The interference detection system segments total interference into two distinct components: in-network interference and foreign interference. This segmentation is achieved by correlating airtime usage data with interference measurements, allowing the system to separate interference caused by local network traffic from external interference sources, thereby improving measurement accuracy without requiring overly complex additional hardware

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces airtime usage correlation as an intermediary mechanism to distinguish between in-network and foreign interference. By using airtime usage data as a mediator, the system can identify which portion of total interference originates from local network devices versus external sources, enabling more accurate channel selection decisions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If processors frequently switch channels based on total interference, then interference avoidance may be improved, but network stability deteriorates due to unnecessary channel switches caused by in-network interference

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechannel selection reliabilityVSAvoidnetwork configuration stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting interference into in-network and foreign components, the system can make more reliable channel selection decisions. The processor only triggers channel switches when foreign interference exceeds thresholds, not when in-network interference fluctuates, thereby reducing unnecessary channel switches and improving network stability while maintaining reliable interference avoidance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of switching channels in response to any increase in total interference, the system inverts the logic by only switching when foreign interference (not in-network interference) exceeds thresholds. This inversion prevents unnecessary channel switches caused by normal network traffic patterns while still responding to actual external interference threats

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

3Measurement precision

If processors account for in-network interference in channel selection, then channel selection accuracy is improved, but processing complexity increases due to correlation analysis requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechannel interference assessment accuracyVSAvoidprocessing algorithm complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The airtime usage correlation mechanism serves multiple functions simultaneously: it identifies in-network interference sources, quantifies their contribution to total interference, and provides data for channel selection decisions. This multi-functionality allows the system to achieve accurate channel interference assessment without requiring separate complex processing algorithms for each function

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses existing airtime usage data, which is already being collected for network management purposes, to simultaneously perform interference source identification. This self-service approach allows the processor to distinguish between in-network and foreign interference using data already available in the system, avoiding the need for additional complex measurement or data collection mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS12395911B2In-network wireless interference detection
Publication Date: 2025.08.19 CALIX INC
  • US12395911B2 patent drawing
  • US12395911B2 patent drawing
  • US12395911B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for interference detection includes one or more processors are configured to receive from one or more access points within a wireless network information indicative of airtime usage of one or more client devices associated with the one or more access points, determine an amount of total interference for at least one of the access points on a first channel, the total interference including foreign interference and in-network interference, determine a correlation between the total interference and the airtime usage of the one or more client devices, determine an amount of the foreign interference or an amount of the in-network interference based on the correlation, and selectively switch the at least one of the access points from communicating on the first channel to communicating on a second channel based on the determined amount of the foreign interference or the determined amount of the in-network interference.