Wireless Communication Device Interleaving Size Adjustment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In wireless communication systems using multiple radio systems, the application of error correction codes (ECC) to layers above the physical layer introduces processing delays due to interleaving, which can compromise error correction capabilities.

Innovation Solution

A wireless communication device and method that dynamically sets interleaving sizes based on transmission delay differences between radio systems, optimizing interleaving sizes for each system to maintain high error correction capability while reducing processing delays.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If error correction codes (ECC) are applied to layers above the physical layer in multi-radio systems, then error correction capability is improved, but processing delay increases due to interleaving

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror correction capabilityVSAvoidprocessing delay
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the interleaving size adjustable rather than fixed. The controller dynamically sets different interleaving sizes for different radio systems based on their transmission delay characteristics, allowing the system to optimize between error correction capability and processing delay in real-time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of interleaving size to resolve the contradiction. By varying the interleaving size parameter according to transmission delay differences between radio systems, the system achieves both high error correction capability (with larger interleaving sizes) and reduced processing delay (with smaller interleaving sizes) in different contexts

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If large interleaving sizes are used to enhance error correction capability, then reliability is improved, but processing delay increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror correction capabilityVSAvoidinterleaving processing delay
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by assigning different interleaving sizes to different radio systems based on their individual transmission delay characteristics. Instead of using a uniform interleaving size throughout the system, each radio system receives tailored interleaving parameters suited to its specific performance characteristics

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple radio systems with different transmission delays are used, then system versatility is improved, but coordinating interleaving processing becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemulti-radio system capabilityVSAvoidinterleaving coordination complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by having the controller pre-determine and set the interleaving sizes for each radio system before data transmission begins. This advance configuration simplifies the coordination complexity by establishing the interleaving parameters upfront based on known transmission delay characteristics, rather than attempting to coordinate in real-time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS8842588B2Wireless communication device and wireless communication method
Publication Date: 2014.09.23 PANASONIC INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY CORP OF AMERICA
  • US8842588B2 patent drawing
  • US8842588B2 patent drawing
  • US8842588B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A high error correction capability is kept while reducing a processing delay in application of the ECC in a multi-radio. A wireless communication device for performing data transmission by using a plurality of radio systems RAT1 and RAT2 includes, in a GLL 100 that absorbs a difference in physical layer and MAC layer among RATs, an encoder 301 that encodes transmission data, a multiplexer 302 that distributes encoded data in correspondence with the RAT1 and the RAT2, interleavers 303 and 304 that interleave a plurality of coded data that has been encoded and multiplexed, and a resource controller 305 that sets an interleaving size for each interleaving processing in the interleavers 303 and 304 based on a transmission delay difference between the RAT1 and the RAT2.