Wireless Device Network Jamming Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for combating network jamming in cellular networks, such as frequency hopping and diversity mechanisms, negatively impact system efficiency and are impractical due to the scarcity of radio spectrum, making it difficult to effectively detect and prevent jamming.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for detecting network jamming by monitoring abnormal signals in wireless devices and network nodes, which report unusual transmissions not associated with known pilot signals or containing errors, allowing for the identification of jamming activity without directly preventing it, enabling authorities to take action.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If frequency hopping or diversity mechanisms are employed to combat network jamming, then resilience against jamming is improved, but spectrum efficiency and system capacity deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresilience against jammingVSAvoidspectrum efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary detection of jamming conditions by monitoring abnormal signals before deploying anti-jamming mechanisms. The network node detects jamming through measurements of abnormal signals from wireless devices, then selectively activates frequency hopping or diversity mechanisms only in affected areas and time periods, rather than continuously across the entire network

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies anti-jamming mechanisms locally rather than globally. The network node identifies specific geographic areas or frequency bands experiencing jamming through abnormal signal detection, and applies frequency hopping or diversity mechanisms only to those specific locations, leaving other areas to operate with normal, more efficient configurations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If frequency hopping or diversity mechanisms are employed to combat network jamming, then resilience against jamming is improved, but device complexity and resource consumption worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresilience against jammingVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary detection of jamming conditions through monitoring abnormal signals. The network node receives measurements from wireless devices about abnormal signals and determines whether jamming is present before activating complex anti-jamming mechanisms, thereby avoiding unnecessary complexity in normal operating conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements anti-jamming mechanisms partially rather than fully. Instead of always employing frequency hopping or diversity mechanisms across all transmissions, the system applies them only to specific transmissions affected by detected jamming, reducing overall device complexity and resource consumption while maintaining resilience where needed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11304055B2Detecting network jamming
Publication Date: 2022.04.12 TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL)
  • US11304055B2 patent drawing
  • US11304055B2 patent drawing
  • US11304055B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method in a wireless device comprises monitoring one or more aspects of signaling with a network for abnormal signals indicative of network jamming. The method comprises detecting, based on the monitored one or more aspects of signaling with the network, one or more abnormal signals indicative of network jamming.