Wireless Key Distribution for Small Guided Ordnance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing Type 1 cryptographic devices are unsuitable for smaller guided ordnance due to size constraints, security risks, and logistical challenges, as they require physical control and cannot be easily embedded or rekeyed, leading to inefficiencies and high costs.

Innovation Solution

A system for managing encryption keys and secure communications in small, low-power systems using a primary control element and remotely controlled device, where keys are generated and transmitted securely over a wireless link, allowing for local initialization and periodic key changes to prevent unauthorized access and ensure secure operations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If Type 1 cryptographic devices are used in smaller guided ordnance, then security is improved, but device size and weight exceed available space constraints

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoiddevice weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The cryptographic system is divided into two separate components: a Type 1 cryptographic device that remains on the ground for key generation, and a smaller embeddable cryptographic module embedded in the guided ordnance. This segmentation allows the security functions to be distributed, enabling the ordnance to carry only essential lightweight cryptographic components while maintaining high security through the ground-based Type 1 device.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A ground-based control element acts as an intermediary between the Type 1 cryptographic device and the embeddable cryptographic module in the ordnance. The control element receives key material from the Type 1 device and transmits it securely to the ordnance, enabling secure key distribution without requiring the full Type 1 device to be embedded in the small ordnance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If Type 1 cryptographic devices are physically controlled, then security is improved, but logistical complexity and costs increase due to inability to easily rekey

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoidlogistical complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from static keying where cryptographic devices are permanently programmed with fixed keys, to dynamic keying where keys can be remotely updated and changed. The embeddable cryptographic module in the ordnance can receive new key material through wireless transmission, allowing keys to be dynamically updated without physical access to the device, thereby reducing logistical complexity while maintaining security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The embeddable cryptographic module in the ordnance is designed to autonomously receive, process, and implement new key material through wireless communication with a ground-based control element. This self-service capability eliminates the need for manual key loading and physical handling, simplifying logistics and reducing costs associated with key distribution and device rekeying.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If cryptographic keys are pre-loaded into ordnance, then security is improved, but adaptability decreases as keys cannot be changed after programming

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoidkey reconfigurability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from static keying where cryptographic devices are permanently programmed with fixed keys, to dynamic keying where keys can be remotely updated and changed. The embeddable cryptographic module in the ordnance can receive new key material through wireless transmission, allowing keys to be dynamically updated without physical access to the device, thereby reducing logistical complexity while maintaining security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Reliability

If Type 1 cryptographic devices are embedded in small ordnance, then security is improved, but device complexity and power consumption exceed available resources

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The cryptographic system is divided into two separate components: a Type 1 cryptographic device that remains on the ground for key generation, and a smaller embeddable cryptographic module embedded in the guided ordnance. This segmentation allows the security functions to be distributed, enabling the ordnance to carry only essential lightweight cryptographic components while maintaining high security through the ground-based Type 1 device.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS10981306B1Cryptographic system for secure command and control of remotely controlled devices
Publication Date: 2021.04.20 THE CHARLES STARK DRAPER LABORATORY INC
  • US10981306B1 patent drawing
  • US10981306B1 patent drawing
  • US10981306B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method operate on a first electronic device and a second electronic device. The first device has a control system and a cryptographic communications module. The second device has a key generator, a user interface, and a cryptographic communications module. The second device generates a single-mission cryptographic key that is securely programmed into the first device, and the first device is deployed to a remote location. The user interface receives a command for controlling the first device. The second device encrypts the command according to the cryptographic key, and transmits the encrypted command to the first device. The first device authenticates the command, decrypts it, and passes the decrypted command to the control system. The first device may be actively guided ordnance, and the second device may be a control element for controlling the actively guided ordnance. The key may be automatically obfuscated upon mission completion or termination.