Wireless Multi-User Lockout Interface Without Mechanical Keys

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional lockout/tagout devices and procedures are cumbersome and inefficient, particularly in large electrical power systems, due to the logistical challenges of managing and tracking numerous mechanical locks and keys, delays in key availability, and the need for coordinated efforts by multiple workers, leading to increased costs and downtime.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of electronically actuated multi-user locking mechanisms with wireless control interfaces, allowing workers to securely establish and remove safety lockout chains using electronic credentials, eliminating the need for physical keys and enabling remote participation, thus reducing the number of locks required and streamlining the process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional mechanical lockout/tagout devices are used, then worker safety is ensured through physical locking mechanisms, but the system becomes cumbersome and inefficient due to the need to manage and track numerous mechanical locks and keys

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworker safetyVSAvoidlogistical management of locks and keys
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces conventional mechanical locking mechanisms with an electronically actuated locking device that uses electronic credentials (RFID cards, key fobs, or mobile devices) to control access. The electronic lockout/tagout system eliminates the need for physical keys and mechanical lock management, while maintaining worker safety through electronic authentication and automated locking protocols

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates electronic copies of traditional lockout functionality through software-based authentication mechanisms. Instead of physical keys, workers use electronic credentials that can be digitally replicated and managed, allowing multiple access methods (RFID cards, mobile devices) to replace single physical keys without increasing physical lock inventory

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Reliability

If multiple workers use conventional mechanical locks, then safety is maintained through coordinated locking, but delays occur due to key availability issues and the need for coordinated efforts by multiple workers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety through coordinated lockingVSAvoiddelays in key availability and coordination
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The electronic locking device incorporates real-time feedback mechanisms that track the status of each worker's lockout credential. The system automatically monitors which workers have active lockout credentials, their current location, and the status of locked equipment. This feedback enables automatic coordination of lockout/release operations, eliminating the need for manual key coordination and reducing delays

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

Workers can independently manage their own lockout credentials using electronic devices. The system automatically handles authentication, lock engagement, and release coordination without requiring physical key exchange or manual coordination between workers. The electronic system self-manages the complex multi-worker coordination that previously required human intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If conventional mechanical locking systems are used in large electrical power systems, then safety isolation is achieved, but costs and downtime increase due to the number of locks required and management overhead

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety isolationVSAvoidcosts and downtime
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The electronic locking device serves multiple functions simultaneously: it acts as a lockout mechanism, an authentication system, a tracking device, and a communication interface. A single electronic device can replace numerous mechanical locks, providing universal access control across multiple locations and equipment types, thereby reducing the total number of locking devices needed and lowering overall system costs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the fundamental parameters of lockout management from physical to digital domain. Instead of managing physical lock inventory, key distribution, and mechanical maintenance, the system manages electronic credentials and software protocols. This parameter change dramatically reduces the resources required for lockout/tagout operations while maintaining or improving safety isolation effectiveness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP3918580B1Lockout/tagout system and method including multi-user lockout device with electronic locking and wireless control interface
Publication Date: 2025.09.03 EATON INTELLIGENT POWER LTD
  • EP3918580B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3918580B1 patent drawingFigure 3
  • EP3918580B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

Lockout/tagout devices are configured to receive multi-user, electronically generated locking and unlocking commands over wireless interfaces to realize lockout safety chains of a desired length to assure worker safety in an industrial system. Electronically implemented systems and methods are also disclosed providing for enhanced worker safety, increased security, and improved lockout/tagout oversight involving a reduced number of locking devices and with fewer complications compared to conventional lockout/tagout devices, systems and processes.