Wireless Multi-User Lockout Interface for Keyless Safety Chains

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional lockout/tagout devices and procedures are cumbersome, inefficient, and logistically challenging due to the need for multiple mechanical locks and keys, which can lead to delays, increased costs, and inefficiencies in maintaining electrical power systems, especially in large systems with transient worker populations.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of electronically actuated multi-user locking mechanisms with wireless control interfaces, allowing workers to securely establish and remove safety lockout chains using electronic credentials and wireless communication, reducing the need for physical keys and enabling remote participation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional mechanical lockout/tagout devices are used, then worker safety is ensured through physical locking mechanisms, but the system becomes cumbersome and logistically challenging due to the need for multiple locks and keys

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworker safetyVSAvoidnumber of locks and keys
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple lockout functions into a single electronic lockout device that can store multiple lockout credentials and manage multiple locks electronically. This merging reduces the physical number of locks and keys needed while maintaining the safety function through electronic credential verification and lock management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces mechanical locking mechanisms with an electronic locking system that uses electronic credentials, wireless communication, and digital authentication. This substitution eliminates the need for physical keys and manual lock manipulation while maintaining security through electronic verification and control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If multiple mechanical locks are used for each worker, then individual worker safety is ensured, but the procedure becomes inefficient and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveindividual worker safetyVSAvoidlockout procedure efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The electronic lockout device provides universal functionality by accommodating multiple workers and multiple lockout scenarios through a single device. It can store multiple worker credentials, manage multiple locks, and handle different lockout situations electronically, eliminating the need for separate physical locks for each worker while maintaining individual safety accountability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical lockout procedures with an automated electronic system that handles credential verification, lock engagement, and safety chain management automatically. This substitution significantly improves procedure efficiency by eliminating manual key distribution, lock installation, and coordination while maintaining individual worker safety through electronic authentication.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If conventional lockout devices are used with transient worker populations, then safety is maintained, but logistical challenges and costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety maintenanceVSAvoidlogistical management
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The electronic lockout device provides universal access control for transient worker populations by storing multiple credentials and providing wireless authentication. This eliminates the need for physical key distribution and retrieval logistics, allowing transient workers to access lockout functions through electronic credentials while maintaining safety standards.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces physical key management infrastructure with an electronic credential system that uses wireless communication and digital authentication. This substitution eliminates logistical challenges associated with key distribution, tracking, and security for transient workers while maintaining safety through electronic verification and audit trails.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Productivity

If electronic lockout mechanisms with wireless control are implemented, then procedure efficiency is improved and resource allocation is optimized, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocedure efficiencyVSAvoidelectronic control system
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements electronic lockout mechanisms with wireless control interfaces that replace manual mechanical operations. The electronic system provides automated credential verification, wireless communication capabilities, and digital lock management, which improve procedure efficiency by eliminating manual key handling and coordination while the integrated design manages device complexity through consolidation of functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUSRE50769E1Lockout/tagout system and method including multi-user lockout device with electronic locking and wireless control interface
Publication Date: 2026.01.27 EATON INTELLIGENT POWER LTD
  • USRE50769E1 patent drawing
  • USRE50769E1 patent drawing
  • USRE50769E1 patent drawing

AI summary

Lockout/tagout devices are configured to receive multi-user, electronically generated locking and unlocking commands over wireless interfaces to realize lockout safety chains of a desired length to assure worker safety in an industrial system. Electronically implemented systems and methods are also disclosed providing for enhanced worker safety, increased security, and improved lockout/tagout oversight involving a reduced number of locking devices and with fewer complications compared to conventional lockout/tagout devices, systems and processes.