Wireless Manual Guide Device for Robot Programming

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing manual guide devices for industrial robots are cumbersome, costly, and complex to install and transfer between robots, making the programming process inefficient and laborious.

Innovation Solution

A portable, wireless manual guide device with a miniaturized microprocessor control system and a joystick with six degrees of freedom, equipped with Bluetooth communication for easy interfacing with a teach pendant, allowing for intuitive movement control of the robot's Tool Center Point without the need for complex cable connections.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a manual guide device is mounted directly on the movable structure of the robot, then the programming activity becomes more intuitive, but the device becomes cumbersome, costly, and complex to install and transfer

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprogramming intuitivenessVSAvoidinstallation and transfer complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The manual guide function is segmented from the robot's main structure. Instead of integrating sensors and control systems directly into the robot, the invention uses a portable external device (smartphone or tablet) that communicates wirelessly with the robot controller, separating the guidance interface from the robot hardware.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A wireless communication intermediary (Bluetooth or Wi-Fi connection) is introduced between the portable device and the robot controller. This intermediary eliminates the need for physical cable connections and force/torque sensors, simplifying both installation and transfer while maintaining full manual guidance functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If force/torque sensors are used for manual guidance, then precise control is achieved, but the device becomes costly and complex to interface with the control system

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanual guidance precisionVSAvoidcontrol system interfacing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The mechanical force/torque sensor system is replaced with an electronic/software-based solution. The portable device uses software algorithms to interpret touch inputs and convert them into robot movement commands, eliminating the need for complex mechanical sensors and their associated wiring and calibration systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The portable device leverages its own built-in sensors (accelerometers, gyroscopes, touch screens) and processing capabilities to provide manual guidance functionality. The device serves itself by using its inherent hardware and software resources rather than requiring external sensor systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If wired connections are used for manual guidance devices, then reliable communication is achieved, but the devices are cumbersome and difficult to transfer between robots

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication reliabilityVSAvoiddevice transferability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

Physical wired connections are replaced with wireless communication technologies (Bluetooth or Wi-Fi). This substitution maintains reliable communication through established wireless protocols while completely eliminating cables, making the guidance device portable and easily transferable between different robots without physical reconnection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Measurement precision

If the operator moves around the robot to verify TCP positions, then accurate verification is achieved, but the programming process becomes time-consuming and complex

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveTCP position verification accuracyVSAvoidprogramming time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The portable device acts as an intermediary that brings the verification capability directly to the operator's hand. The device displays real-time TCP position information and allows control without the operator needing to physically move around the robot, maintaining verification accuracy while significantly reducing programming time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS8412379B2Robot system
Publication Date: 2013.04.02 COMAU SPA
  • US8412379B2 patent drawing
  • US8412379B2 patent drawing
  • US8412379B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A robot system having a manual guide device connected to the robot in wireless data communication with a portable terminal for use in programming the robot.