Wireless Retail Merchandise Security Using Inertial Distance Tracking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional retail display security systems are either mechanically or electro-mechanically tethered to merchandise, relying on external references for positioning, and often require vulnerable keys, leading to increased theft risks and false alarms, which negatively impact the customer experience and security effectiveness.

Innovation Solution

A portable security system with sensors, output devices, and a controller that determines distance traveled from a 'home' position using inertial navigation, activating alarms and wireless communications without external references, and can be integrated into electronic merchandise or used as a display battery pack or externally mounted module.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional tethered security systems or EAS tags are used to protect merchandise, then security protection is provided, but customer experience is reduced due to restricted interaction with merchandise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity protectionVSAvoidcustomer experience
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical tethering systems and electro-mechanical EAS tags with a wireless security system that uses radio frequency communication. The security tag wirelessly communicates with the security system without requiring physical attachment or mechanical keys, thereby maintaining security protection while eliminating restrictions on customer interaction with merchandise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If conventional security systems use mechanical or electro-mechanical cables tethered to merchandise, then security is provided, but device complexity increases and customer interaction is restricted

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent eliminates mechanical cables and electro-mechanical connections by implementing a wireless security system using radio frequency communication. This substitution reduces device complexity by removing physical tethering components while maintaining security functionality through wireless tagging and communication infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Ease of operation

If keys are used to disarm alarms and detach merchandise from security systems, then security control is enabled, but security vulnerabilities increase due to key theft and unauthorized access

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity controlVSAvoidsecurity vulnerability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and eliminates the physical key component from the security system. Instead of using mechanical, magnetic, or optical keys that can be lost or stolen, the system uses wireless authentication where the security tag itself serves as the credential. This eliminates the vulnerability associated with physical key theft while maintaining convenient security control through wireless communication.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Ease of operation

If wireless security systems rely on external references like GPS or RF signals for positioning, then wireless operation is enabled, but reliability decreases due to false alarms from signal loss

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewireless operationVSAvoidfalse alarm rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a self-contained wireless security tag that does not rely on external GPS or RF reference signals for its core security function. The tag autonomously maintains its security state and communicates with the security system independently, eliminating false alarms caused by external signal loss while preserving wireless operation capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution provides effective theft protection without mechanical tethers or external references, reducing false alarms and enhancing the customer experience by allowing free interaction with merchandise while maintaining robust security.

Implementation Method 1

The item of electronic merchandise includes an accelerometer coupled to the housing

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAccelerometer: Accelerometer

Implementation Method 2

The item of electronic merchandise includes a gyroscope coupled to the housing

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGyroscope: Gyroscope

Implementation Method 3

The item of electronic merchandise includes a digital compass coupled to the housing

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic field detection: Magnetic Field

Implementation Method 4

The processor is configured to determine a distance traveled by the item of merchandise from a retail display home position based upon the output from the at least one sensor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInertial navigation: Inertia

Data Source

PatentUS9928703B2Systems and methods for protecting retail display merchandise from theft
Publication Date: 2018.03.27 ALPHA SECURITY PRODUCTS INC
  • US9928703B2 patent drawing
  • US9928703B2 patent drawing
  • US9928703B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Security systems and methods configured for use with an item of merchandise for retail display include a housing, at least one sensor carried by the housing and at least one output device carried by the housing. The security system further includes a controller carried by the housing and operably coupled to the sensor and to the output device. The controller is operable to determine a distance traveled by the item of merchandise from a retail display “home” position based upon a sensor input from the sensor, and to activate the output device based upon the distance traveled by the item of merchandise exceeding a threshold distance. The controller may utilize the at least one sensor in conjunction with an inertial navigation system (INS) and motion processing algorithms or techniques to determine the distance traveled by the item of merchandise from the retail display “home” position.