Wireless Mode Selection via Centralized Interference Cost Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Wireless terminals often lack the information needed to determine the most suitable communication mode (direct or infrastructure) that minimizes overall system interference, leading to suboptimal decisions due to limited knowledge of their surroundings and potential interference effects on multiple cells.

Innovation Solution

A centralized control node determines the communication mode based on interference considerations across multiple cells, comparing direct and infrastructure mode interference cost estimates to select the mode with the lowest system-wide interference, without requiring frequent distribution of network interference information to wireless terminals.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If wireless terminals make mode decisions independently based on limited local information, then device autonomy and simplicity are improved, but system-wide interference optimization deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice autonomyVSAvoidsystem interference
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

A control node acts as an intermediary between wireless terminals and the network infrastructure. The control node collects interference information from multiple cells, processes it centrally, and provides mode recommendations to terminals. This mediator resolves the contradiction by enabling terminals to make informed decisions without requiring them to have complete system knowledge, thus maintaining device autonomy while achieving system-wide interference optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If centralized control determines communication mode based on system-wide interference information, then overall system performance is improved, but information distribution complexity and resource consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem performanceVSAvoidinformation distribution system
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the complex interference information processing function from individual terminals and concentrates it in a dedicated control node. The control node collects interference data from multiple cells, processes it centrally, and provides simplified mode recommendations to terminals. This extraction eliminates the need for complex information distribution systems while maintaining system-wide optimization, as the control node handles all interference analysis centrally.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Measurement precision

If interference information is frequently distributed to wireless terminals, then mode decision accuracy is improved, but network resource consumption and signaling overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemode decision accuracyVSAvoidnetwork resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of continuously distributing complete interference information to all terminals, the system provides partial information in the form of mode recommendations only when needed. The control node determines communication modes based on current interference conditions and provides these recommendations to terminals on demand, rather than continuously updating all terminals with full interference data. This reduces signaling overhead and network resource consumption while maintaining sufficient accuracy for mode decisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS8428629B2Methods and apparatus for determining a communications mode and/or using a determined communications mode
Publication Date: 2013.04.23 QUALCOMM INC
  • US8428629B2 patent drawing
  • US8428629B2 patent drawing
  • US8428629B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and apparatus for determining a mode of wireless communications to be used by a wireless terminal, e.g., a direct communications mode or an infrastructure communications mode are described. In some embodiments, the mode to be used is determined by a control node based on interference which will be caused to the system taking into consideration at least an area, e.g., cell, in which the wireless terminal seeking to communicate is not located. System interference cost estimates for each mode under consideration are generated and compared. Interference cost estimates may, and do, correspond to different frequency bands when the direct mode uses a different frequency band than the infrastructure communications mode. Separate interference cost estimates and mode determinations are made for different communications directions in some embodiments. The determined mode to be used is communicated to the devices seeking to communicate, e.g., via one or more base stations.