Wireless Network Adaptation via Coordinated Probing Transmissions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Wireless networks face challenges in efficiently adapting and reconfiguring network points and carriers due to interference changes and traffic fluctuations, leading to suboptimal performance and user experience degradation, as existing methods are slow to respond to sudden interference conditions and require iterative and complex procedures.

Innovation Solution

The method involves eNBs coordinating probing transmissions and timings to synchronize UE actions, receiving feedback, and further coordinating operations to apply probing transmissions on broader time-frequency resources, using reconfiguration signals to adjust UE filtering and measurement processes, and utilizing probing resources to predict and fine-tune network configurations without disrupting normal data transmissions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If traditional iterative reconfiguration procedures are used to adapt network points and carriers, then network stability is maintained, but adaptation speed to interference changes is slow and latency is high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptation speedVSAvoidreconfiguration procedure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing probing transmissions and measurements on selected time-frequency resources before actual network reconfiguration. This allows the network to predict interference conditions and evaluate potential reconfiguration outcomes in advance, enabling faster decision-making without disrupting normal operations. The probing phase prepares the system for rapid adaptation when reconfiguration is needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the reconfiguration process into distinct phases: probing phase (measurement and prediction), decision phase (evaluation), and execution phase (actual reconfiguration). By dividing the complex iterative procedure into separable stages, the system can operate more efficiently with reduced latency while maintaining stability during normal data transmissions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Measurement precision

If probing transmissions are performed on broader time-frequency resources, then measurement accuracy improves, but interference with normal data transmissions increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterference measurement accuracyVSAvoidinterference to normal transmissions
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by performing probing transmissions only on specifically selected time-frequency resources rather than across the entire spectrum. These probing resources are strategically chosen to provide sufficient measurement accuracy for interference prediction while occupying minimal resources that would otherwise be available for normal data transmissions, thus reducing harmful interference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses probing transmissions as an intermediary mechanism to indirectly assess interference conditions without directly impacting normal data transmissions. The probing signals serve as a mediator that allows the network to gather measurement data on selected resources, predict interference patterns, and make reconfiguration decisions while keeping the actual data transmission channels largely undisturbed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If reconfiguration is performed quickly to respond to interference changes, then user experience is maintained, but normal data transmissions may be disrupted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser experience qualityVSAvoiddata transmission stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs probing and evaluation actions in advance before executing actual reconfiguration. This preliminary phase allows the system to predict interference conditions and assess the impact of potential reconfigurations on ongoing data transmissions, enabling quick response to interference changes while minimizing disruption to user experience.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements periodic probing transmissions at strategically selected intervals and resources. This periodic approach allows the network to continuously monitor interference conditions and perform reconfigurations at optimal moments, maintaining user experience quality while reducing the frequency and impact of disruptions to normal data transmissions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUSRE48161E1Systems and methods for adaption and reconfiguration in a wireless network
Publication Date: 2020.08.11 FUTUREWEI TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • USRE48161E1 patent drawing
  • USRE48161E1 patent drawing
  • USRE48161E1 patent drawing

AI summary

An embodiment method for adaptation and reconfiguration in a wireless network includes base stations coordinating and setting aside a set of time-frequency resources for probing purposes, the base stations coordinating a set of probing transmissions and timings to be used to synchronize base stations/UEs actions, the base stations signaling the resources and timings to UEs, the base stations performing coordinated operations on the resources according to the timings, the base stations receiving feedback reports from UEs based on UE measurements on the signaled resources according to the signaled timings, and the base stations further coordinating the operations for further probing or to apply probing transmissions on broader time-frequency resources.