Wireless Telecommunication Alarm Correlation for Root Cause Diagnosis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Diagnosing the root cause of issues in wireless telecommunication networks is challenging due to alarms propagating through interconnected components, leading to prolonged resolution times and inefficient problem-solving processes.

Innovation Solution

A system that creates correlation and causation signatures from multiple alarms, using historical data and machine learning to predict the root cause, and generates automated tickets for resolution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If traditional alarm analysis methods are used in wireless telecommunication networks, then all alarms are processed individually, but this leads to prolonged resolution times and many unnecessary attempts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresolution timeVSAvoidproblem-solving efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the complex alarm analysis problem by creating distinct signature components: correlation signatures that group related alarms together, causation signatures that identify root causes, and effect signatures that track propagated impacts. This segmentation transforms the overwhelming task of analyzing all alarms individually into manageable signature-based patterns, directly reducing resolution time while improving productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces signature-based patterns as intermediary representations between raw alarms and root cause identification. These signatures act as mediators that encode relationships between alarms, allowing the system to infer causation without directly analyzing every alarm interaction. This intermediary layer dramatically reduces analysis time while maintaining high accuracy in identifying root causes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If alarms are propagated through interconnected network components, then comprehensive monitoring is achieved, but the root cause becomes difficult to diagnose among many raised alarms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork monitoring coverageVSAvoidroot cause diagnosis difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the essential diagnostic information from the complex web of propagated alarms by creating correlation signatures that isolate the unique pattern of alarm relationships. Instead of analyzing all alarms equally, the system extracts and focuses on the signature pattern that identifies the root cause, separating the signal from the noise of propagated effects. This extraction process maintains comprehensive monitoring coverage while making root cause detection straightforward.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent inverts the traditional approach by not starting with individual alarms and trying to find the root cause, but rather by establishing signature patterns of root causes first and then matching observed alarm patterns against these signatures. This inversion transforms the difficult problem of finding needles in haystacks into the easier problem of pattern matching, maintaining full monitoring coverage while simplifying root cause identification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Data Source

PatentUS12363564B2Determining a cause of an issue associated with a wireless telecommunication network
Publication Date: 2025.07.15 T MOBILE US INC
  • US12363564B2 patent drawing
  • US12363564B2 patent drawing
  • US12363564B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The system receives multiple alarms indicating the issue associated with the network and obtains multiple categories associated with the multiple alarms. The category indicates a component associated with the network. Based on the multiple categories, the system creates a correlation signature associated with the multiple alarms. The system obtains historical data including a historical correlation signature that is the same as the correlation signature, a cause associated with the historical correlation signature, and an indication of accuracy associated with the cause. The system determines whether the indication of accuracy satisfies a first criterion. Upon determining that the indication of accuracy satisfies the first criterion, the system makes a prediction that the cause associated with the multiple alarms indicating the issue is the same as the cause associated with the historical correlation signature.