Wireless Node Communication Paths for Cost-Effective Asset Tracking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing tracking systems, such as barcodes and RFID tags, are inefficient and costly for monitoring the location and environmental conditions of items during transit, lacking the ability to provide robust and extensive asset management in a cost-effective manner.

Innovation Solution

A wireless node network with a hierarchy of nodes, including low-cost ID nodes and more sophisticated master nodes, dynamically adjusts communication formats based on environmental changes to efficiently track and manage items, using adaptive messaging to enhance visibility and location services.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If sensor-based tracking systems are used to monitor location and environmental conditions, then measurement precision and information quality are improved, but device complexity and cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetracking precisionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides tracking functionality into two segments: basic location tracking using simple RFID tags for all items, and detailed environmental monitoring using sensors only for items requiring condition monitoring. This segmentation allows the system to achieve comprehensive tracking precision while avoiding the complexity and cost of deploying sensors on every item.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The RFID tags are designed to serve multiple functions: basic identification, location tracking, and serving as a platform for optional sensor attachment. This multi-functionality allows the same base infrastructure to support both simple tracking and complex monitoring needs, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining measurement precision for items that require it.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Productivity

If RFID tags are used for automatic tracking without manual scanning, then productivity is improved, but measurement precision and environmental condition monitoring capability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetracking efficiencyVSAvoidcondition monitoring capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges RFID technology with environmental sensors into an integrated tracking tag. The RFID component provides automatic identification and location tracking for high productivity, while integrated sensors add temperature, humidity, and shock monitoring capabilities. The merged system maintains the automatic tracking efficiency of RFID while enhancing measurement precision through sensor data collection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The tracking tag uses a composite structure combining RFID circuitry with sensor modules and power management components. This composite design enables the tag to perform both automatic identification (maintaining productivity) and environmental condition monitoring (improving measurement precision), resolving the contradiction between tracking efficiency and monitoring capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Loss of information

If comprehensive sensor-based tracking systems are deployed across the entire network, then measurement precision and visibility are improved, but loss of energy and operational costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovevisibilityVSAvoidoperational cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts sensor activation and data collection frequency based on item characteristics, location, and risk factors. High-value or temperature-sensitive items receive continuous monitoring with high visibility, while standard items use periodic or event-triggered monitoring. This dynamic approach maintains necessary visibility for critical items while reducing energy consumption and operational costs across the overall network.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters such as sensor sampling rate, transmission frequency, and monitoring intensity based on item priority and environmental conditions. For example, sensors may operate at low power mode during stable conditions and switch to high-frequency monitoring when anomalies are detected. This parameter adjustment maintains information visibility for critical items while optimizing energy usage and reducing operational costs system-wide.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12524732B2Methods and node apparatus for multiple node communication paths to a server within a wireless node network
Publication Date: 2026.01.13 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP
  • US12524732B2 patent drawing
  • US12524732B2 patent drawing
  • US12524732B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and apparatus are described for enhanced node communication within a wireless node network having nodes and a server. The method begins with a first node associating with a second node, and the first node capturing relevant node information. The first node transmits the relevant node information to the server via the second node operating as an intermediary for indirect communication with the server. A third node captures relevant node information and transmits the relevant node information to the server without using the second node as an intermediary or bridge to the server. Each of the first node, the second node, and the third node may be wireless transceiver-based nodes and respectively implemented as integrated circuits.