Wireless Device Policy Enforcement via Location Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing technologies fail to effectively address the disruptions and safety issues caused by wireless devices in various settings, such as noise, light, and electromagnetic interference, and lack the ability to automatically modify or disable their functions based on specific conditions or locations.

Innovation Solution

A system that detects wireless devices within a certain range and modifies their functions, such as silencing audible ringers, reducing display brightness, or disabling Bluetooth, using modules like GPS or triangulation to enforce policies, allowing designated zones to control device operations and prevent inappropriate use.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If wireless devices are allowed to operate freely in all locations, then user convenience and communication functionality are improved, but disruptions (noise, light, electromagnetic interference) and safety issues increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser convenienceVSAvoiddisruptions and safety issues
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-establishes policy rules for different geographic locations before wireless devices enter those areas. When a device enters a designated zone, the policy is automatically enforced without requiring real-time user decision-making, thus preventing disruptions before they occur while maintaining user convenience through automatic operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

A policy enforcement system acts as an intermediary between wireless devices and the environment. This intermediary receives location information from devices, determines applicable policies based on geographic location, and automatically enforces appropriate restrictions (such as silencing audio outputs or reducing display brightness) to prevent harmful effects while allowing device operation to continue.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If manual control of wireless device functions is required in sensitive areas, then policy compliance can be ensured, but user experience and convenience deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepolicy complianceVSAvoiduser convenience
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables wireless devices to automatically determine their own location, retrieve applicable policies for that location, and enforce those policies on themselves without user intervention. The device self-adjusts functions such as audio output and display brightness based on its geographic location, ensuring policy compliance while maintaining user convenience through automatic operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors the wireless device's location and automatically adjusts device functions based on policy requirements for the current area. This closed-loop feedback mechanism ensures that policies are reliably enforced while the user experiences no disruption, as the adjustments occur automatically based on real-time location information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Object-affected harmful factors

If wireless devices are completely disabled in sensitive areas, then safety and disruption prevention are improved, but communication functionality and user access are lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety and disruption preventionVSAvoidcommunication functionality
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different levels of policy enforcement to different geographic locations rather than uniformly disabling devices everywhere. In sensitive areas, specific functions are restricted (such as audio outputs or high-power transmissions), while less sensitive areas allow full functionality. This localized approach prevents disruptions in critical zones while maintaining communication capabilities in other areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of completely disabling wireless devices in sensitive areas, the system applies partial restrictions that target only the specific functions causing disruptions (such as silencing ringtones or reducing display brightness) while allowing other communication functions to continue operating. This partial action approach maintains sufficient communication functionality while preventing harmful effects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS9451448B2Apparatus and methods for enforcement of policies upon a wireless device
Publication Date: 2016.09.20 APPLE INC
  • US9451448B2 patent drawing
  • US9451448B2 patent drawing
  • US9451448B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Apparatus and methods for changing one or more functional or operational aspects of a wireless device, such as upon the occurrence of a certain event. In one embodiment, the event comprises detecting that the wireless device is within range of one or more other devices. In another variant, the event comprises the wireless device associating with a certain access point. In this manner, various aspects of device functionality may be enabled or restricted (device “policies”). This policy enforcement capability is useful for a variety of reasons, including for example to disable noise and/or light emanating from wireless devices (such as at a movie theater), for preventing wireless devices from communicating with other wireless devices (such as in academic settings), and for forcing certain electronic devices to enter “sleep mode” when entering a sensitive area.