Wireless Preamble Mark Symbol for Fast 802.11 Protocol Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current wireless communication protocols face challenges in efficiently detecting and processing preambles across different IEEE 802.11 standards, particularly due to the complexity and time required for defining new preambles, which burdens hardware and increases false-alarm probabilities.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating a mark symbol with a signature or cyclic redundancy check (CRC) field in the preamble to indicate the protocol, allowing receiving devices to identify the protocol and facilitate proper processing without additional hardware complexity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional preamble structures are used across different IEEE 802.11 standards, then hardware complexity increases and false-alarm probabilities increase, but protocol detection accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotocol detection accuracyVSAvoidhardware complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The preamble is segmented into distinct functional components: a legacy portion for compatibility, a mark symbol containing a signature field for protocol identification, and a CRC field for error detection. This segmentation allows receiving devices to quickly identify the protocol type through the signature field without requiring complex hardware to parse entire preamble structures, thereby improving detection accuracy while reducing hardware complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The mark symbol acts as an intermediary element between the legacy preamble portion and the protocol-specific data. It contains a signature field that serves as a mediator for protocol identification, enabling receiving devices to determine the packet protocol type without directly analyzing complex protocol-specific preamble structures, thus reducing false alarms and hardware complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If new preambles are defined for each protocol version, then protocol identification accuracy improves, but the time required for preamble definition and processing increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotocol identification accuracyVSAvoidpreamble processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The mark symbol with its signature field is placed early in the preamble structure, before protocol-specific data. This preliminary action allows receiving devices to quickly identify the protocol type at the beginning of packet reception, enabling them to prepare appropriate processing parameters in advance without waiting to analyze the entire preamble, thus reducing processing time while maintaining accurate protocol identification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If protocol-specific preamble structures are implemented, then data recovery accuracy improves, but hardware complexity and false-alarm probabilities increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata recovery accuracyVSAvoidfalse-alarm probabilities
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The mark symbol serves as an intermediary that provides clear protocol identification through its signature field, allowing receiving devices to correctly configure protocol-specific processing parameters. This prevents false alarms by ensuring that packets are processed with the correct protocol interpretation, thereby improving data recovery accuracy without requiring complex hardware to distinguish between different protocol formats.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The CRC field in the mark symbol provides feedback mechanism for error detection in protocol identification. By verifying the CRC, receiving devices can confirm correct protocol detection and avoid false alarms, ensuring reliable data recovery while maintaining simple hardware structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11038529B2Wireless preamble design for wireless communication devices and methods
Publication Date: 2021.06.15 QUALCOMM INC
  • US11038529B2 patent drawing
  • US11038529B2 patent drawing
  • US11038529B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In some aspects, methods and apparatus for wireless communications are configured to generate a packet for wireless communication where the packet includes a mark symbol in a preamble of the packet where the mark symbol includes a signature or stamp field in the mark to provide protocol information that indicates the protocol of the packet, such as an 802.11 EHT packet. In some other aspects, a cyclic redundancy check field in the mark symbol may be manipulated in various ways to indicate the protocol of the packet in lieu of providing the signature or stamp field.