Wireless Rate Adaptation for Disruption Handling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional wireless communication systems are not adequately equipped to handle disruptions caused by diverse factors, as they often mistakenly attribute signal weakening to path loss and reduce transmission rates, which can exacerbate interference-related disruptions.

Innovation Solution

A dynamic rate adaptation method that selects the optimal transmission rate by analyzing characteristics such as frame error rate (FER) to differentiate between disruptions due to path loss and interference, adjusting rates accordingly to minimize disruptions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If transmission rate is reduced to accommodate disruptions, then communication link stability is improved, but transmission time increases and interference-related disruptions are exacerbated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication link stabilityVSAvoidtransmission time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically changes the transmission rate parameter based on the identified disruption cause. When path loss is detected, the rate is reduced to maintain link stability. When interference is detected, the rate is increased to minimize transmission time and reduce vulnerability to interference, thus resolving the contradiction between reliability and transmission time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The transmission rate is made dynamic rather than static, allowing the system to adapt to different disruption scenarios in real-time. The rate adaptation mechanism adjusts the transmission rate based on current channel conditions and disruption type, optimizing both reliability and transmission time for each specific situation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If transmission rate is reduced uniformly for all disruptions, then link stability is maintained, but data throughput decreases and interference disruptions are worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelink stabilityVSAvoiddata throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different transmission rate adjustments based on the local condition of the disruption type. Instead of a uniform reduction, the rate is selectively reduced only for path loss scenarios while being increased for interference scenarios, thus maintaining link stability where needed while preserving throughput in interference conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The transmission rate parameter is dynamically adjusted based on the specific disruption cause identified through analysis of communication characteristics. This selective parameter change ensures that throughput is maintained when interference is the cause, while stability is prioritized when path loss is detected.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If transmission rate is increased to maintain throughput, then productivity is improved, but vulnerability to disruptions increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata throughputVSAvoiddisruption vulnerability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The transmission rate is dynamically adjusted based on real-time disruption detection and classification. The system transitions between different rate states depending on the detected disruption type, allowing high throughput when conditions permit and providing protection when disruptions are present, thus resolving the contradiction between productivity and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from communication characteristics (such as signal strength, error rates) to detect disruptions and adjust the transmission rate accordingly. This closed-loop control ensures that the transmission rate is optimized for both throughput and reliability based on current channel conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS7872974B2System and method for handling or avoiding disruptions in wireless communication
Publication Date: 2011.01.18 APPLE INC
  • US7872974B2 patent drawing
  • US7872974B2 patent drawing
  • US7872974B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A wireless communication method comprises selecting a cause of a disruption from two or more potential causes of disruptions by associating at least one characteristic of a communication with a device with the selected cause of a disruption and changing a data rate for the communication from an existing data rate to a new data rate based upon the at least one characteristic of the communication.