Wireless Receiver Power Control via Partial ID Packet Processing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Wireless interface devices face significant battery power consumption issues due to the need to transition from a low power state to a high power state for functions like scanning and receiving packets, which limits their battery lifetime.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a wireless receiver system that wakes only a portion of the processing circuit from a low power state to process a partial ID packet, correlates the processed portion, and compares the result to a correlation threshold, allowing for reduced power consumption and potential false hit reduction through additional validation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the wireless receiver processes full ID packets in operational state, then detection reliability is improved, but power consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection reliabilityVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the ID packet processing into segments: first processing only a portion of the ID packet to generate a correlation result, then conditionally processing the remaining portion if the first correlation exceeds a threshold. This segmentation allows the system to achieve reliable detection while minimizing the time the processing circuit remains in the operational state, thus reducing power consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements partial action by processing only a portion of the ID packet initially rather than the full packet. The processing circuit wakes from low power state, processes the partial packet, and only wakes again if needed for further processing. This partial processing approach maintains detection reliability while significantly reducing power consumption compared to processing full packets every time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

2Use of energy by moving object

If the processing circuit remains in low power state longer, then power consumption decreases, but detection speed worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower consumptionVSAvoiddetection speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by processing a portion of the ID packet first to generate an initial correlation result before committing to full packet processing. This preliminary processing allows the system to quickly determine whether further processing is needed, enabling faster detection decisions while minimizing unnecessary wake-ups and power consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The processing circuit operates in periodic cycles: wake from low power state, process partial packet, evaluate correlation result, then either return to sleep or proceed with full processing. This periodic action pattern optimizes both detection speed and power consumption by ensuring the circuit wakes only when necessary and processes data in efficient bursts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Reliability

If additional processing validation is performed, then false hit reduction is improved, but power consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefalse hit reductionVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses partial action for validation by processing only a portion of the ID packet initially to generate a correlation result. Full processing and additional validation are performed only when the initial correlation exceeds a threshold, indicating a potential match. This approach reduces false hits through proper validation while minimizing power consumption by avoiding unnecessary full processing of non-matching packets.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback through threshold comparison: the correlation result from partial processing is compared against a threshold, and this feedback determines whether full processing should proceed. This feedback mechanism ensures that additional processing validation is performed only when justified by the initial correlation result, thereby reducing false hits while controlling power consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS7630331B2Power control techniques for wireless devices
Publication Date: 2009.12.08 AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL SALES PTE LTD
  • US7630331B2 patent drawing
  • US7630331B2 patent drawing
  • US7630331B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Various embodiments are disclosed relating to wireless systems, and also relating to power control techniques for wireless devices. One disclosed embodiment comprises a wireless receiver that includes a processing circuit. In one example embodiment, at least a portion of the processing circuit may wake from a low power state to an operational state to receive and process only a portion of an ID packet during the operational state. The portion of the ID packet that is received and processed may be less than a full ID packet, which may provide power savings.