Wireless Data Flow Resource Priorities for Adaptive QoS Mapping

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for configuring logical channel mapping restrictions in wireless communication systems result in resource waste and inefficiency due to single priority values, limitations in joint application of restrictions, and static priority configurations that do not adapt to varying QoS requirements.

Innovation Solution

Configuring multiple resource types with differing priorities for data flows between network nodes and wireless terminals, allowing dynamic adjustment of priority values based on QoS requirements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If single priority value is used for logical channel mapping restriction, then configuration simplicity is maintained, but resource utilization efficiency deteriorates due to resource waste

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconfiguration simplicityVSAvoidresource utilization efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the single priority value into multiple priority values (first priority value and second priority value) corresponding to different resource types. This allows the system to differentiate priority levels for different resource allocations, thereby improving resource utilization efficiency while maintaining manageable configuration complexity through structured segmentation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces dynamic priority adjustment by configuring different priority values for different resource types based on QoS requirements. The priority values can be dynamically adjusted according to traffic demands and service requirements, enabling the system to adapt to varying conditions and optimize resource allocation in real-time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Stability of the object's composition

If static priority configuration is used, then configuration stability is maintained, but adaptability to varying QoS requirements deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconfiguration stabilityVSAvoidadaptability to QoS requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the static priority configuration into a dynamic system where priority values can be adjusted based on QoS requirements. The network device can configure different priority values for different resource types and update these configurations as QoS demands change, providing both stability through structured configuration and adaptability through dynamic adjustment capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the priority parameter from a fixed static value to a configurable parameter that can vary based on QoS requirements. By allowing the priority values to be modified according to different service demands and traffic conditions, the system achieves adaptability while maintaining configuration stability through standardized parameter management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If limited resource types are configured, then system complexity is reduced, but resource allocation efficiency deteriorates due to inability to meet varying data traffic demands

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoidresource allocation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments resources into multiple resource types (first resource type and second resource type) with different priority values. This segmentation enables the system to allocate different resource types based on specific data traffic demands and QoS requirements, improving resource allocation efficiency while keeping the system manageable through structured classification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal resource allocation framework that can handle multiple types of data traffic with different QoS requirements using the same multi-priority mechanism. The system can universally apply different priority values to different resource types across various service scenarios, achieving both complexity reduction through standardization and efficiency improvement through flexible allocation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20260075636A1Resource types with different priorities for data flow in wireless communications systems
Publication Date: 2026.03.12 SHARP KK
  • US20260075636A1 patent drawing
  • US20260075636A1 patent drawing
  • US20260075636A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A network node of a telecommunications system comprises node processor circuitry and node interface circuitry. The node processor circuitry is configured to configure plural resource types for a data flow between the network node and a wireless terminal and differing priorities for at least two of the resource types of the data flow. The node interface circuitry is configured to transmit to the wireless terminal a message that identifies the plural resource types for the data flow and the differing priorities for the at least two of the resource types of the data flow. A wireless terminal comprises terminal interface circuitry which is configured to receive the message from the network node and terminal processor circuitry configured to use the plural resource types for the data flow and the priority of the at least one resource type of the data flow to communicate with the network node.