Wireless Data Flow Resource Types for Adaptive QoS Priorities
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Current practices in Logical Channel (LCH) Mapping Restriction for resource allocation in 5G wireless communication systems result in resource waste and inefficiency due to single priority values, limitations in configuring multiple restrictions, and static priority settings that do not adapt to varying QoS requirements.
Innovation Solution
Configuring multiple resource types with differing priorities for data flows between network nodes and wireless terminals, allowing dynamic adjustment of priority based on QoS requirements, and using a message to identify these resource types and priorities.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Device complexity
If single priority value is used for resource allocation, then device complexity is reduced, but resource utilization efficiency deteriorates
Solution Approach 1:
The patent segments the single priority value into multiple priority values, each associated with different resource types. This allows the system to assign different priorities to different resource allocations, thereby improving resource utilization efficiency while maintaining manageable complexity through structured segmentation.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent introduces dynamic priority adjustment mechanisms that allow priority values to change based on QoS requirements and network conditions. This dynamic approach enables the system to adapt to varying data demands and optimize resource allocation in real-time, resolving the contradiction between fixed complexity and variable efficiency requirements.
2Device complexity
If static priority settings are used, then device complexity is reduced, but adaptability to varying QoS requirements deteriorates
Solution Approach 1:
The patent transforms static priority settings into dynamic priority configurations that can adapt to varying QoS requirements. By introducing mechanisms for priority adjustment based on network conditions and service requirements, the system achieves both adaptability and controlled complexity through systematic dynamic management.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent utilizes parameter changes in priority values to adapt to different QoS requirements. By modifying priority parameters dynamically based on network state and service needs, the system achieves versatility in handling diverse QoS scenarios while maintaining structured complexity management through parameter-based control.
3Productivity
If multiple resource types with differing priorities are configured, then resource utilization efficiency is improved, but device complexity increases
Solution Approach 1:
The patent segments resources into multiple resource types with distinct priority levels, allowing differentiated allocation strategies. This segmentation improves resource utilization efficiency by matching appropriate resources to appropriate services while maintaining manageable complexity through structured categorization and assignment rules.
4Reliability
If LCH Mapping Restriction is applied, then resource allocation control is improved, but resource waste increases due to single priority values
Solution Approach 1:
The patent segments the single priority value associated with LCH Mapping Restriction into multiple priority values corresponding to different resource types. This segmentation enables more precise resource allocation control while reducing waste by allowing high-priority data to access appropriate resources without being constrained by a single priority level that may not match all resource types.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent modifies the priority parameter from a single fixed value to multiple variable values associated with different resource types. This parameter change enables the LCH Mapping Restriction to control resource allocation more effectively while minimizing waste by matching priority levels to resource characteristics and data requirements.
Data Source
AI summary
A network node of a telecommunications system comprises node processor circuitry and node interface circuitry. The node processor circuitry is configured to configure plural resource types for a data flow between the network node and a wireless terminal. The node interface circuitry is configured to transmit, over a radio interface to the wireless terminal, a message that identifies the plural resource types for the data flow. A wireless terminal comprises terminal interface circuitry configured to receive the message from the network and terminal processor circuitry configured to determine the plural resource types for the data flow from the message and to use the plural resource types for the data flow to communicate with the network node over the data flow.