Wireless Sensor Network Superframe Structure for Burst Traffic

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The IEEE 802.15.4-2006 standard for wireless sensor networks fails to meet the stringent requirements for latency and reliability needed for industrial deployments, particularly due to limitations in channel access management and resource allocation in multi-hop networks, which are inflexible and inefficient in handling burst traffic and retransmissions.

Innovation Solution

A distributed protocol that manages resources automatically through a scalable communication schedule, allowing for retransmissions within the same super frame, dynamic allocation of bandwidth, and channel hopping, which enhances reliability and adaptability to burst traffic without requiring assistance from higher layers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If IEEE 802.15.4-2006 standard is used for wireless sensor networks, then low cost and flexibility are achieved, but latency and reliability requirements for industrial deployments are not met

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovereliabilityVSAvoidcomplexity of channel access management
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic super frame structure where the coordinator can adjust the number and duration of contention-free periods based on real-time network conditions and traffic requirements. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to optimize reliability for industrial applications while maintaining cost-effectiveness of wireless deployment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the super frame into multiple contention-free periods, each dedicated to specific traffic types or priority levels. This segmentation enables deterministic scheduling of critical industrial traffic while allowing other traffic to use contention-based access, thereby achieving both high reliability for time-sensitive data and efficient resource utilization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Adaptability or versatility

If TDMA based systems are used with static non-adaptive time slot allocation, then resource allocation is simplified, but flexibility to handle failed transmissions and burst traffic is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to burst trafficVSAvoidlatency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic time slot allocation where the coordinator can reallocate time slots within contention-free periods based on observed traffic patterns and transmission success rates. This allows the system to adapt to burst traffic conditions and retransmission requirements without sacrificing deterministic latency bounds, as all allocations occur within the structured super frame timeline.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If centralized management approach is used for TDMA, then resource allocation is efficient, but scalability to large multi-hop networks is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of resource allocationVSAvoidscalability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the network into multiple coordinator nodes, each managing its own cluster of nodes and maintaining independent super frames. This segmentation enables scalable deployment across large industrial networks while preserving centralized management benefits within each coordinator's domain. The distributed coordinator architecture eliminates single points of failure and allows parallel resource allocation decisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a hierarchical dimension to resource management where coordinators manage local resources within their super frames, and higher-level coordination occurs through inter-coordinator communication protocols. This multi-dimensional approach allows efficient local resource allocation while enabling network-wide scalability through hierarchical organization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Reliability

If retransmission opportunities are not provided in TDMA systems, then time slot allocation is simpler, but reliability for handling failed transmissions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of data deliveryVSAvoidcomplexity of super frame structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent reserves specific time slots within each super frame as retransmission opportunities before data transmissions occur. This preliminary preparation of retransmission resources allows the system to handle failed transmissions reliably without requiring complex real-time scheduling decisions, as the retransmission slots are pre-configured in the super frame structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentEP2253174B1Method for communicating in a wireless network including a plurality of nodes
Publication Date: 2012.05.09 MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC CORP
  • EP2253174B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2253174B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2253174B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

In a wireless network that includes multiple nodes, each periodic announcement cycle of a communication schedule is partitioned into a set of time slots, including a set of management time slots, a set of beacon time slots, and a set of superframe time slots. Management frames are broadcast during the management slot to specify beacons. Beacons are transmitted during the beacon slots to specify when to transmit the superframes during the superframe time slots.