Decentralized Wireless Sensor Node Scheduling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current wireless sensor networks face high energy consumption due to active radio receiver/transceivers, and the reliance on a centralized coordinator for synchronizing beaconing windows creates a single point of failure and complexity.

Innovation Solution

Nodes autonomously determine and adjust their active and inactive periods based on decentralized communication methodologies, such as determining the longest gap between transmissions to optimize energy consumption and eliminate the need for a centralized coordinator.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a centralized coordinator is used to synchronize beaconing windows and assign time slots, then communication collisions are minimized and node activity is coordinated, but the system becomes vulnerable to single point of failure and requires additional complexity for coordinator maintenance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork robustnessVSAvoidcoordinator management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the centralized coordinator from the system by having nodes autonomously determine their active/inactive periods based on decentralized communication. Each node independently tracks transmission gaps and adjusts its duty cycle without requiring a central authority, thereby eliminating the single point of failure while reducing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Nodes perform self-organization by autonomously determining their communication schedules based on observed transmission patterns. Each node monitors the longest gap between transmissions from other nodes and adjusts its own active period accordingly, enabling self-synchronized operation without external coordination or complex management infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If nodes are kept active for longer periods to ensure reliable communication, then communication reliability is improved, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication reliabilityVSAvoidradio receiver energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic adjustment of node activity periods based on real-time observation of transmission gaps. Nodes continuously monitor the longest gap between transmissions and adjust their active periods accordingly, optimizing the balance between communication reliability and energy consumption. This dynamic adaptation allows nodes to extend activity periods when needed for reliability while minimizing activity when possible for energy saving.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

Nodes change their operational parameters (active/inactive period durations) based on observed transmission patterns. By measuring the longest gap between transmissions and adjusting their duty cycles accordingly, nodes optimize energy consumption while maintaining sufficient communication reliability. This parameter adaptation allows the system to respond to varying network conditions without fixed schedules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS7697488B2Organizing communications in a network
Publication Date: 2010.04.13 ORACLE AMERICAN INC
  • US7697488B2 patent drawing
  • US7697488B2 patent drawing
  • US7697488B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and system suitable for use in organize communications in a network. The organization process optionally being suitable to facilitating nodal communications so as to minimize energy consumption and activity periods associated with nodal communications. The process being adaptable for use with any number of nodes, such as but not limited to nodes associated with wireless sensor nets or other networks.