Wireless Terminal Coexistence Interference Mitigation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Wireless communication terminals face interference issues due to the simultaneous operation of multiple wireless interfaces, particularly when cellular technologies like LTE coexist with short-range technologies like WiFi or Bluetooth, as the operating frequencies can cause interference, and RF filters do not provide sufficient rejection of adjacent frequencies.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of methods and mechanisms in wireless terminals to mitigate interference by performing measurements, reporting interference levels, triggering coexistence interference avoidance mechanisms, and adapting scheduling and handover strategies based on channel state information and interference thresholds, including inter-frequency handovers, time division multiplexing, and rescheduling of transmissions to minimize interference.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If multiple wireless interfaces operate simultaneously, then wireless functionality and versatility are improved, but interference between interfaces occurs due to adjacent frequency operations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewireless functionalityVSAvoidinterface interference
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs measurements and reports interference levels before interference occurs. The network entity receives measurement reports indicating potential interference conditions and proactively triggers coexistence interference avoidance mechanisms, such as scheduling transmissions during non-overlapping time periods or frequency bands, preventing interference before it degrades performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adapts transmission parameters based on real-time interference conditions. The network entity adjusts scheduling decisions, frequency selections, and power levels according to measured interference levels and coexistence conditions, allowing the system to optimize performance under varying operational scenarios while maintaining multiple wireless functionalities

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Measurement precision

If RF filters are used to reject adjacent frequencies, then frequency selectivity is improved, but sufficient rejection of adjacent frequencies cannot be achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefrequency selectivityVSAvoidadjacent frequency interference
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces a measurement and reporting intermediary layer between the wireless interfaces and the network entity. Measurement reports act as intermediaries that convey interference conditions to the network entity, which then triggers appropriate avoidance mechanisms. This intermediary approach enables coordinated interference management that exceeds what passive RF filtering can achieve

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops where measurement reports continuously inform network entity decisions about transmission scheduling and resource allocation. The network entity uses this feedback to adjust transmissions dynamically, creating a closed-loop system that actively manages interference rather than relying solely on passive filtering

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Object-affected harmful factors

If coexistence interference avoidance mechanisms are triggered, then interference between interfaces is reduced, but operating efficiency may be impacted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoexistence interferenceVSAvoidoperating efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies interference avoidance mechanisms selectively rather than continuously. Coexistence interference avoidance is triggered only when measurement reports indicate actual interference conditions exist. This partial application approach prevents unnecessary restrictions on transmission operations, maintaining operating efficiency while providing adequate interference protection when needed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters such as scheduling time periods, frequency selections, and power levels based on measured interference conditions. By dynamically adjusting these parameters rather than imposing fixed restrictions, the system maintains optimal operating efficiency under normal conditions while effectively reducing interference when coexistence problems are detected

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP3190851B1Method and apparatus supporting multiple radios technologies
Publication Date: 2019.03.27 GOOGLE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS LLC
  • EP3190851B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3190851B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3190851B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A method in a wireless terminal supporting operation on a first wireless technology and a second wireless technology comprises performing one or more measurements on a received signal of the first wireless technology, wherein the one or more measurements are performed during time periods that overlap time periods during which the wireless terminal transmits signals of the second wireless technology and the one or more measurements comprise channel state information measurements. The method further comprises transmitting, to a first base station, measurement information comprising the one or more measurements, and sending, to the first base station, an indication of a periodicity of planned transmission by the wireless terminal of signals of the second wireless technology. A method performed in a base station is also disclosed and claimed.