Wireless Terminal Interference Cancellation via Zone Synchronization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In wireless communication networks, especially in WiMAX systems, interference from neighboring Base Stations (BSs) degrades reception performance due to unsynchronized zone types and switching times, making interference cancellation inefficient and unreliable.

Innovation Solution

The system provides synchronization information to communication terminals about the synchronization status of time intervals allocated by the Serving BS and neighboring BSs, allowing the terminals to apply appropriate interference cancellation mechanisms based on zone synchronization, enhancing interference estimation and cancellation performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If interference cancellation is applied without synchronization information, then device complexity is reduced, but interference cancellation performance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterference cancellation performanceVSAvoidterminal processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The base station performs preliminary synchronization by aligning zone types and switching times across multiple base stations before terminal interference cancellation operations. This pre-synchronization ensures that interfering signals from neighboring base stations follow predictable patterns, allowing terminals to effectively cancel interference without requiring complex adaptive processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where base stations exchange synchronization status information about their zone configurations. This feedback enables terminals to acquire accurate synchronization information and adapt their interference cancellation algorithms accordingly, improving performance while maintaining reasonable computational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If zone synchronization is implemented across all base stations, then interference cancellation performance is improved, but network coordination complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal reception qualityVSAvoidnetwork coordination complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The network is segmented into groups or clusters of base stations that share synchronization information within each group. This segmentation approach allows zone synchronization to be implemented locally among base stations in the same group, improving interference cancellation performance for terminals served by those base stations, while avoiding the need for complex全网-wide coordination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A universal synchronization protocol and information exchange format is established that can be applied across different base station groups. This multi-functional framework allows the same synchronization mechanism to serve multiple purposes: coordinating zone types, aligning switching times, and providing terminals with the information needed for interference cancellation, thereby reducing overall network coordination complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If synchronization information is provided to terminals, then interference cancellation reliability is improved, but information overhead increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterference cancellation accuracyVSAvoiddownlink information overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

Only the essential synchronization information parameters are extracted and transmitted to terminals, such as zone type indicators and switching time alignment data. By taking out only the critical synchronization elements rather than transmitting complete base station configuration information, the system improves interference cancellation reliability while minimizing downlink information overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The synchronization information is encoded using compact parameter representations and efficient signaling formats. By changing the representation parameters of synchronization data (e.g., using differential encoding, compact state indicators), the system conveys necessary synchronization status with reduced bit requirements, thereby improving interference cancellation accuracy without significantly increasing information overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS8831046B2Time synchronization in wireless communication networks
Publication Date: 2014.09.09 ALTAIR SEMICON LTD
  • US8831046B2 patent drawing
  • US8831046B2 patent drawing
  • US8831046B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A communication terminal includes a Radio Frequency (RF) unit and a baseband processor. The baseband processor is coupled to receive from the a servicing base station (BS) information indicating an extent of synchronization between the servicing BS and at least one other BS of the wireless communication network, and to process received signals, responsively to the extent of the synchronization specified in the received information, so as to cancel interference caused to the signals received from the servicing BS by signals transmitted by the at least one other BS.